Appropriate mechanisation for African agriculture
by Sarah REYNOLDS
In most African countries 70 - 80 % of the population is still
engaged in agriculture but, despite this, food production is not growing fast
enough to keep up with population growth. It is apparent that to increase
agricultural output the productivity of the land under cultivation must be
increased and a substantial improvement would be achieved through improved
mechanisation.
Mechanisation does not mean solely tractorisation, however, but
all implements from hand tools, animal draft implements, tractors and
postharvest machinery used to transport, process and store produce. But
mechanisation must be appropriate to the varying conditions of different regions
and not only appropriate but affordable. A farmer has to make a significant
profit before he can buy, or get a loan to buy, motorised equipment or even
draught animals and the appropriate tools. He must mechanise in stages.
Many African farmers have small holdings of mixed crops and
motorised machinery may not, contrary to expectation, actually improve yields.
Most serious trials have shown that, in mixed cropping systems, good hand
cultivation is more effective. In particular, post emergence weeding is
difficult by machine and agricultural engineers can do more to help such farmers
by improving hand tools and draught animal harness and equipment. Kenya, among
other countries, has recognised the importance of this first step - that
improvement of animal traction harness and equipment will increase the
productivity of both man and animals. Old European designs have been modified
using local fibres and fabrics in the harnesses. Tools are made lighter than
European models to ease the load on draught animals faced with breaking up hard
dry soil and, where necessary the width of cut on ploughs and cultivators has
been reduced.
Hand tools remain the most widely used implements in Africa for
cultivation, weeding, harvesting and even threshing. Many traditional designs
reflect the materials available in the past when relatively simple technology
for casting metal often resulted in heavy hoes and sickle blades. Now that
modern steel is available, it is possible to make strong and long - lasting hoes
and other tools from less weight of metal. This in turn permits a change in
design of handles: - for instance, hoe handles can be made longer and
cultivation and weeding can be done with less effort and with a straighter back.
It is essential that farmers are encouraged to increase yields
and produce more for sale so that extra income is generated. It is only when
yields have been achieved which are above those required for susbsistence, and
there is a market for their produce that provides them with a profit. that
farmers will have money to invest in improved mechanisation. Therefore marketing
and pricing policies for farm produce must take account of this. Shortage of
money is the main constraint preventing improved mechanisation for, if machinery
is to be developed, there must be a market in which to sell it. Further, for
larger, more complicated machinery which carries high development costs, the
potential market has to be wider than one nation. It is here that regional
cooperation through such associations as the African Regional Centre for
Engineering Design and Manufacturing (ARCEDEM) and the Euro African Association
of Agricultural Engineers (ACEMA) is essential to achieve standardisation. And
standardisation brings with it economics of scale. Too often in the past
individual nations have developed their own design specifications resulting in
too many machines available for one job/process, all requiring their own spare
parts, in a market that is too small. Regional cooperation could lead to
different countries specialising in different equipment. (This sounds like
Utopia, whereas the reality is more likely to be a desire on the part of each
nation to be the one with the manufacturing base selling to all its neighbours).
Governments must agree on a realistic level of cross - border tax levies since
high tax on spare parts will discourage proper maintenance.
Agricultural engineers have to realise that appropriate
technology is not necessarily simple technology. A battery - started engine that
is incapable of hand - starting will soon cease to be useful if there is no
readily available power source to recharge the battery. Spare parts must be
easily and quickly available and stored efficiently. It has been found that up
to 15% of spare parts may be unusable through bad storage which has led to
corrosion and other damage. Maintenance input must be kept low and simple or
running costs can be ruinous.
The small farmer may well derive more benefit from technological
development in produce storage, handling and processing than in tractorisation.
Up to 30% of a crop can be lost post - harvest and if this largely unnecessary
wastage can be reduced by improving harvesting, transportation from field to
store, improving threshing and shelling machines and conveyors then the
principal aim of increasing agricultural productivity of the land will already,
to some extent, have been achieved.
Simple tools developed for easier harvesting of cassava allows
tubers to be lifted over a longer season even from dry, hard soils. This removes
the need to harvest only when soils are soft and this reduces long - term
storage of tubers which spoil in store. Improvements to groundnut shellers can
reduce cracking and greatly increase the value of shelled nuts offered for sale.
More efficient sugar cane crushers and palm nut crackers yield more juice and
oil. Simple solar driers speed the loss of moisture and, in the case of fish,
can reduce losses to insect infestation. Improved stores improve smoking of fish
and reduce fuel costs.
For pest control in the field, the development of lightweight
battery driven ultra low volume (ULV) sprayers has reduced the difficulty of
finding a supply of clean water since the pesticides formulated for these
sprayers do not require dilution: a plastic container of ready - to - use
chemical is simply screwed onto the sprayer head. Operators are also spared the
weight of a water - filled knapsack sprayer on their backs resulting in less
fatigue and a much faster rate of work.
Tractorisation
Tractorisation has most potential in areas of limited rainfall
and where field size is sufficient for manoeuvrability. Although smaller,
cheaper tractors or even two - wheel cultivators may seem desirable and more
attainable for the small farmer, the often hard dry conditions in Africa require
a bigger, more powerful machine. Since few farmers have sufficient land to
justify a tractor, this leaves him with the option of purchasing the tractor and
hiring it out on a contract basis or forming a tractor - owning cooperative.
Both options can be successful but for contract hire it is essential that land
is cleared of rocks and tree stumps or the cost of repairs to the tractor will
soon exceed the hire charge. Communal ownership is proving successful in
Zimbabwe although there are problems with the input of time and the level of
mangement skill that is required to operate the scheme: small farmers cannot
spare time from their own farm work to manage the tractor hiring and, in many
cases, do not have the numeracy and literacy skills required. This highlights a
major need - that of training. This has to be solved by long term planning if
mechanisation is to be successful and to achieve its objectives.
The African Regional Centre for Engineering Design and
Manufacturing (ARCEDEM) based in Ibadan, Nigeria, was established in 1980 to
develop the capability for engineering design and manufacture of industrial and
agricultural machines and equipment. It now has 24 Member States and 250 African
engineers trained in design and development. It is funded by annual
contributions from Member States and by grants from international organisations,
national governments and financial institutions. It is cosponsored by the United
Nations Economic Commission for Africa (ECA), the Organisation for African Unity
(OAU) the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the United Nations
Industrial Development Organisation (UNIDO).
ARCEDEM, which has a staff of 250 trained engineers, provides
facilities for the design, development, adaptation and testing of machinery and
equipment and also training in design, manufacture and maintenance.
ARCEDEM
Km 9 Ibadan - Iwo Road, PMB 19, UI Post
Office,
Ibadan Nigeria
Training
Theoretical training and practical training - working on farms
or in workshops - must be encouraged. But practical training necessitates a
network of such farms as can provide trainees with the right sort of experience
and learning. Students of general agriculture in University should be given a
background in mechanisation while those studying engineering should be exposed
to aspects of agriculture. Trainers themselves need training since they do not
always understand the needs and attitudes of their trainees and there are
insufficient good teaching aids available for teacher support. Trainers must be
able not only to inform but to motivate trainees to learn more and practice what
they have been taught. Maintenance is an attitude of mind and if people think
that all is well provided the tractor is running and that therefore no attention
need be given to lubrication or to warning signs of impending mechanical trouble
then that tractor will have a short working life.
Development of industrialisation in general will also have some
benefits for agriculture but this argument cannot be taken too far. Trained
mechanics in Africa are often the graduates of automotive mechanic courses and
two problems result: either these mechanics are unable to meet the demands of
agricultural machinery services, adjustment, maintenance and repair because of
their lack of relevant training; or they move from agricultural machinery
maintenance to work with cars and trucks where they feel more comfortable, are
part of an urban community and usually earn more. With regard to skilled
operators of agricultural machinery few training programmes do more than train
drivers. The skills needed to operate complex agricultural machinery
effectively, safely and efficiently go far beyond an ability to steer a tractor
through the field or down the road pulling a trailer. Furthermore, these skills
are not developed in a two - week or even two month course at a training
institute; they can only be developed in a supervised work experience
environment which spans at least two agricultural seasons. Few African countries
yet have training programmes that meet these criteria and the results can be
seen in machinery graveyards and additional work for mechanics already in short
supply.
Exchange of information can help to ensure that machines are
developed not only to high common standards but that they are developed to do
the jobs for which they are most appropriate. ARCEDEM, which has 250 African
engineers trained in design and development, plays an important role in
conducting engineering design and manufacturing training programmes but it has
also introduced specialised courses for maintenance of machinery, project
studies, production techniques, etc. It provides a unique opportunity for
agricultural designers to work on design and produce new prototypes. It is also
conscious that while individual nations have established their own research and
development organisations there is a serious shortage of laboratory testing
equipment for prototype development. This is an area where European countries
can provide both financial and educational assistance.
Mechanisation policy
There will be no progress towards successful agricultural
mechanisation unless policy - makers and governments in Africa give it priority.
It is necessary on a national basis to assess all needs and prioritise those
needs; to review existing networks for the distribution of equipment and spare
parts; to examine existing training facilities, to strengthen those sectors that
are weak and to institute training in sectors where it is lacking; finally, to
analyse current import policies, their impact on local manufacture and to modify
policies to encourage appropriate local design and manufacture.
Ideally, national Agricultural Mechanisation Committees should
be set up to advise on national policies and to liaise through ACEMA with
similar bodies in Africa and Europe. Meanwhile, European governments (possibly
through the EC) could assist by helping to fund ACEMA and by encouraging
European manufacturers to make available designs for equipment no longer in
production. And both African and European partners in this endeavour must put
much more emphasis on training and communication at all stages of the
mechanisation process.
At a recent congress held in Brussels (13 - 17 February 1990)
discussion centred on the challenges of appropriate mechanisation in Africa. The
Congress was organised by the Belgian Federation of the Agricultural and
Horticultural Equipment (UGEPO) and was funded by the Belgian Government, the
Commission of the E.C. and by The Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural
Cooperation (CTA). A further congress which is to be held in June, also in
Brussels, will have as its theme Crop Intensification and the Environment
in Africa. This will also be supported by CTA and will include discussion
on the role of mechanisation in crop intensification.
M. P.
The Euro - African Association of Agricultural Engineering
Centres (ACEMA) which is based in YaoundCameroon, was established to develop
cooperation between European and African centres in the field of agricultural
engineering? to exchange information on research, testing and development of
agricultural machinery and to provide advice to countries wishing to develop
Agricultural Engineering Centres.
ACEMA
PO Box 1040 YaoundR>Cameroon
Tel: 22 33
54
Telex 8325 KN
(Minagri)