Production support by marketing enterprises
2.28 Food marketing enterprises often have an important role in
stimulating and directly supporting raw material production. They can do this by
various means, including the supply of market and technical information, the
supply of production financing, and the supply of certain material inputs (e.g.
seeds, chicks, fertilizers). The incentives for marketing enterprises to provide
such services will depend upon their ability to appropriate the benefits
deriving from them; benefits such as increased output, enhanced product quality,
and output better timed for marketing or processing requirements. The scope for
appropriability of benefits will depend upon the nature of the goods/services
themselves as well as the prevailing market structure.
2.29 For example, the dissemination of technical and market
information has public good properties: such information is non-rival in its
consumption and it is very difficult or costly to exclude individuals benefiting
from the information without contributing to its cost. The marketing enterprise
is unlikely to capture the full benefits from its supply of information since in
a competitive environment, producers can utilize the information and then sell
to a competing buyer. Where such 'free-riding' is widespread, there will be
little incentive for private firms to provide more than minimal market or
technical information. The provision of technical and market information may
also be associated with so-called 'moral hazard' problems. The directed message
may be biased toward the particular needs of the buyer rather than properly
informing the producer about the wider range of technical and market options.
The provision of technical information and the direct supply of production
inputs can also give rise to negative externalities as when the recommended
practices (e.g. heavy chemical use) adversely affect neighboring farmers or
residents.
2.30 With respect to production financing, barriers arise due to
limited collateral and asymmetric information. The producer is generally better
informed than the marketing enterprise about his creditworthiness. The firm's
ability to recover the loan may be better in a non-competitive than in a
competitive market, since in the former case producers will have little or no
alternative market outlet, enabling the lender to deduct the loan amount from
the payments due for the
commodity.