Traditional Honduran hill side farming techniques and resulting problems
Traditional hillside land-use patterns in much of Honduras are
based roughly cr. the following series of events:

Fig. 1. A forested lot is clearcut
and residues are burned

Fig. 2. Crops are planted with rows
oriented up and down the hillside

Fig. 3. Crop yields decline each
year as soil erodes

Fig. 4. The land is planted in
perennial pasture grasses or abandoned after having been cultivated for a
relatively short time (often only 1-20 years, depending on site-specific
factors).
This pattern of land use may avoid some problems with crop pests
and the need for supplemental fertilizer. However, in a densely settled area
land soon becomes scarce, and matureforested, fertile plots are not always
available to be cleared and cultivated. In such densely settled areas, a land
use pattern which results in a permanent cultivation of the same plots is
desired.
There are three related problems associated with this
traditional land use patterns which must be corrected if permanent cultivation
practices are to be successful!: soil erosion, rapid water runoff, and decreased
soil fertility. As the native vegetation is cut and burned, the soil surface is
exposed to the impact of raindrops. The force of the raindrop impact dislodges
soil particles. These soil particles and the valuable nutrients they contain can
then be carried out of the area by the water flowing over the soil surface. This
rapid rainfall runoff means that less water infiltrates into the soil to be
available later, exagerating any natural flood/ drought cycles.
When the native vegetation is intact, the force of falling
raindrops is mostly absorbed by the vegetation, as there is much less bare
ground surface exposed. The decaying leaf litter on the ground and in the upper
soil layers also protects the soil, acting as a sponge, absorbing much of the
rainfall and decreasing the amount that can freely run over the land surface.
Since more of the rainfall remains in the soil rather than running off, the soil
retains its moisture . longer in the absence of rainfall. Since fewer soil
nutrients are lost in runoff water, soil fertility is maintained.
A comparison of these two scenarios illustrates how in the
traditionally farmed field, characterized by the absence of protecting
vegetation, the rainfall impact and the loss of soil particles, dissolved
nutrients, and water are all increased. The rest of this guide focuses on
techniques for reducing the soil erosion and water runoff associated with
agricultural activities, techniques of maintaining or increasing the soil
fertility necessary for permanent cultivation of the same plots, and extension
methods useful in promoting the adoption of these different farming
techniques.