![]() | Bioconversion of Organic Residues for Rural Communities (UNU, 1979, 178 p.) |
![]() | ![]() | From the charter of the United Nations University |
![]() | ![]() | Foreword |
![]() | ![]() | Perspectives on bioconversion of organic residues for rural communities |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Sources of available nutrients |
![]() | ![]() | The most suitable materials for bioconversion |
![]() | ![]() | Characteristics of residues |
![]() | ![]() | Bioconversion systems |
![]() | ![]() | Physical and chemical treatments |
![]() | ![]() | Microbial conversion |
![]() | ![]() | The animal conversion phase |
![]() | ![]() | Summary |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Availability of organic residues as a rural resource |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Discussion summary: Papers by van der Wal and Barreveld |
![]() | ![]() | Micro-organisms as tools for rural processing of organic residues |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Microbial utilization of mono- and di-saccharide residues |
![]() | ![]() | Microbial conversion of starchy residues |
![]() | ![]() | Microbial conversion of complex mixtures of compounds (Polysaccharides, Proteins, Lipids, etc.) |
![]() | ![]() | Microbial utilization of cellulose and ligno-cellulose residues |
![]() | ![]() | Algal culture as a source of biomass |
![]() | ![]() | Microbial utilization of silviculture biomass |
![]() | ![]() | Micro-organisms and marine and freshwater biomass |
![]() | ![]() | International studies on processing organic residues |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Production of feed as an objective for bioconversion systems |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | General characteristics |
![]() | ![]() | Manure as feed |
![]() | ![]() | Sewage-grown micro-algae |
![]() | ![]() | Conclusion |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Environmental goals for microbial bioconversion in rural communities |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Health and water economy |
![]() | ![]() | Fertilizer and energy economy |
![]() | ![]() | Concluding remarks |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Discussion summary: Papers by Porter, Berk and La Rivière |
![]() | ![]() | Strategies for developing small-scale fermentation processes in developing countries |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Discussion summary |
![]() | ![]() | Production of microbial protein foods on edible substrates, food by-products, and ligno-cellulosic wastes |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Preface |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Contributions to the solution of nutritional problems |
![]() | ![]() | Development of protein-rich vegetarian meat substitutes in the western world |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Discussion summary |
![]() | ![]() | The role of ruminants in the bioconversion of tropical byproducts and wastes into food and fuel |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Nutritional limitations in the use of tropical by-products and waste |
![]() | ![]() | Practical experience with tropical by-products and wastes as feed for ruminants |
![]() | ![]() | An integrated system for converting tropical feeds and byproducts into milk, beef, and fuel |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Discussion summary |
![]() | ![]() | Possible applications of enzyme technology in rural areas |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Biocatalytic processes |
![]() | ![]() | Enzyme hydrolysis of manioc |
![]() | ![]() | Whole cell systems |
![]() | ![]() | Cellulose degradation and utilization |
![]() | ![]() | Transfer of enzyme technology to rural communities |
![]() | ![]() | Conclusions |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Discussion summary |
![]() | ![]() | Indian experience with treated straw as feed |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Experience with straw treatment |
![]() | ![]() | Field testing and demonstration of straw treatment |
![]() | ![]() | General considerations |
![]() | ![]() | Summary |
![]() | ![]() | Annex 1. The energy efficiency of the two-stage, feed-fuel processing of straw in indian villages |
![]() | ![]() | Annex 2. Method of calculating the value presented in table 2 for the efficiency of naoh energy usage |
![]() | ![]() | Annex 3. Recommendations to farmers on the treatment of straw |
![]() | ![]() | Annex 4. Calculated efficiency of milk production by straw-fed village buffaloes |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Discussion summary |
![]() | ![]() | Indian experience with algal ponds |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Cultivation of algae in wastes for feed |
![]() | ![]() | Problems of contamination |
![]() | ![]() | Cultivation of algae for biofertilizer |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Acknowledgements |
![]() | ![]() | Discussion summary |
![]() | ![]() | Organic residues in aquaculture |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | The range of production in aquaculture |
![]() | ![]() | The value of organic wastes |
![]() | ![]() | Direct feeding |
![]() | ![]() | Concluding remarks |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Discussion summary |
![]() | ![]() | Biogas generation: developments. Problems, and tasks - an overview |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | What is biogas? |
![]() | ![]() | Microbiology of CH4, or bio-methanogenesis |
![]() | ![]() | The biogas plant-some technical considerations |
![]() | ![]() | Environmental and operational considerations |
![]() | ![]() | Developments and processes for rural areas |
![]() | ![]() | Cost-benefit analyses |
![]() | ![]() | Health hazards |
![]() | ![]() | Bottlenecks, considerations, and research and development |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Discussion summary |
![]() | ![]() | Mushroom production technology for rural development |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Materials and methods for growing mushrooms under natural or field conditions |
![]() | ![]() | Growing mushrooms under semicontrolled conditions |
![]() | ![]() | Results and discussion |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Discussion summary |
![]() | ![]() | The combination of algal and anaerobic waste treatment in a bioregenerative farm system |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Algae production on organic wastes |
![]() | ![]() | The bioregenerative farm |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Discussion summary |
![]() | ![]() | A continuous composting system for disposal and utilization of animal wastes at the village level |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Status of land utilization and disposal of animal wastes |
![]() | ![]() | A continuous composting system for land utilization of animal wastes at the village level |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Bioconversion of fruit and vegetable wastes |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | State of the art of bioconversion |
![]() | ![]() | Technical transfer |
![]() | ![]() | Integrated research on agricultural waste reclamation |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Production of yeast from soybean cooking waste at miso factories |
![]() | ![]() | Application of soy waste as koji substrate for rice miso manufacturing (5, 6) |
![]() | ![]() | Conclusion |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Discussion summary |
![]() | ![]() | Solid state fermentation of starchy substrates |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Materials and methods |
![]() | ![]() | Agro-economic perspectives |
![]() | ![]() | Summary |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Discussion summary |
![]() | ![]() | Production of single-cell protein from cellulose |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Experimental results |
![]() | ![]() | Discussion |
![]() | ![]() | Summary |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Acknowledgements |
![]() | ![]() | Discussion summary |
![]() | ![]() | Analysis of energy cost of integrated systems |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Energy cost and energy requirement |
![]() | ![]() | Why energy analysis? |
![]() | ![]() | Net energy intensity |
![]() | ![]() | What criteria are offered by energy analysis? |
![]() | ![]() | Conclusion |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Analysis of bioconversion systems at the village level |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Approach to bioconversion analysis |
![]() | ![]() | Some results and costs from integrated systems |
![]() | ![]() | Future development possibilities |
![]() | ![]() | Conclusions |
![]() | ![]() | Summary |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Nutritional evaluation of bioconversion products for farm animals |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Testing procedures for determination of nutritional value |
![]() | ![]() | Bioconversion products: toxicology - problems and potential |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Summary |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Nutritional evaluation in humans |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Evaluation of products of bioconversion for human consumption |
![]() | ![]() | Procedures for nutritional evaluation in humans |
![]() | ![]() | The evaluation of various food products |
![]() | ![]() | Concept of productivity |
![]() | ![]() | Conclusions |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Discussion summary: Papers by van Weerden, Shacklady, and Bressani |
![]() | ![]() | Biomass from organic residues for animal and human feeding |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Discussion summary |
![]() | ![]() | Appropriate biotechnology - summary remarks |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Other UNU Publications |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Books |
Asked about the meaning of the term "technological quality" of proteins, Dr. 8ressani replied that the phrase was used to indicate how amenable (or otherwise) protein preparations are to normal domestic or industrial processing. It was recommended that new preparations should be evaluated in terms of their replacement for other protein sources rather than in absolute terms. This is, in fact, the normal procedure when evaluating food mixtures for human consumption.
Senez, commenting upon van Weerden's paper, pointed out that the rations containing yeast in the experiments he described were generally supplemented with methionine. With regard to the apparent differences in species response to the fungus tested, he wished to stress that it related to only one out of several thousands of fungi that might be used. van Weerden agreed with both comments, but said that the latter served to underline his contention that we know very little about this very large subject.
Stanton commented upon the one in one million level of risk mentioned by Shacklady and said this was close to the natural frequency of mutation of many bacteria. He also suggested that Tetrahymena pyriformis could be a useful organism for field-workers comparing or evaluating potential feed ingredients. In reply, Shacklady said that the one in one million possibility of error referred, not to mutagenicity studies, but to lifespan feeding studies on experimental animals, and simply indicated the magnitude of the studies acceptable to the FDA Regarding T. pyriformis, this has been used by some workers as an index of protein quality, but it has a number of disadvantages, one being that it does not have an absolute requirement for lysine, frequently the first limiting amino acid in cereals. As far as Shacklady knows, it has not been used in mutagenicity studies, the most commonly used organisms being Salmonella typhimurium mutants along with those of Escherichia cold and Bacillus subtilis.