![]() | People's Participation in Managing Common Pool Natural Resources : Lessons of Success in India (IRMA, 1992, 26 p.) |
Ballabh, V. & Katar Singh. (1988a). "Managing Forests through People's Institutions: A Case Study of Van Panchayats in Uttar Pradesh Hills". Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics. 43(3), pp. 296-304.
Ballabh, V. & Katar Singh. (1988b). "Van (Forest) Panchayats in Uttar Pradesh Hills: A Critical Analysis." Research Report 2. Anand: Institute of Rural Management.
Banki, Evan S. (1981). Dictionary of Administration and Management. Los Angeles, California: Systems Research Institute.
Buchanan, James M. & Tullock, Gordon. (1965). The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Chandra, N. Satish & Poffenberger, Mark. (1989). "Community Forestry Management in West Bengal: FPC Case Studies." In K. C. Malhotra, K.C., and Poffenberger, Mark. (Eds.) Forest Regeneration through Community Protection: The West Bengal Experience.Calcutta: West Bengal Forest Department.
Chopra, Kanchan, Kadekodi, Gopal K. & Murty, M.N. (1988). Sukhomajri and Dhamala Watersheds in Haryana: A Participatory Approach to Management. New Delhi: Institute of Economic Growth.
Guha, Ramchandra. (1985). "Forestry and Social Protests in Kumaon." Guha Ranjit (Ed.) Subaltern Studies. IV. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Olson, Mancur. (1971). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Rev. Ed. New York:Schocken Books.
Pangare, Ganesh & Pangare, Vasudha. (1991).
Participatory Rural Development - Ralegan Siddhi: A Case Study, Mimeo.
Anand: Institute of Rural Management.
Patil, R.K. (1988). Ralegan Siddhi: An Experience in Watershed Development. Bombay: Centre for Applied Systems Analysis in Development.
Mandalia, V.K. & Charan, A.S. (1989). "Management of Water by Mohini Water Co-operative Society of Gujarat State". Unpublished paper, Surat: South Gujarat University. A summary published in Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, July-Sept.1989, p.288.
Sarabhai, Kartikeya V. et al. (1990). Buffer Zone Restoration in India: Issues and Approaches. Ahmedabad: VIKSAT in collaboration with Centre for Environment Education.
Singh, Katar. (1991). Managing Common Pool Resources: Principles and Case Studies. Mimeo. Anand: Institute of Rural Management.
Trembley, Marc-Adelard. (1982). "The Key Informant Technique: A Non-Ethnographic Application". In Robert G. Burgess. (Ed.) Field Research: A Source Book and Field Manual. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Yin, Robert K. (1984). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. New Delhi/London: Sage Publications.
Table 1 A profile of the selected cases
Particular |
Parwara Van |
Arabari |
Ralegan |
Sukhomajri |
Mohini |
|
Water |
Panchayat |
Experiment |
Siddhi |
Co-operative |
1. Uttar Pradesh |
Location district West Bengal |
Nainital district Maharashtra |
Midnapur district Haryana |
Ahmednagar district Gujarat |
Ambala district |
2. Year when the project was launched |
1932 |
1972 |
1975 |
1979 |
1978 |
3. Number of villages covered |
1 |
11 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
4. Total area covered under the project(ha) |
249 |
1,272 |
972 |
4,085 |
525 |
5. Total population of the project area/ members (1981) |
650 |
3,600 |
2,100 |
538 |
1,440 |
6. Source(s) of funds for the project Dept. |
Villagers themselves FF |
Forest Dept. & Rural Dev. |
GOM,banks & Villagers |
GOH GOG & |
ICAR Members |
7. Implementing agency Protection Committee & GOM |
Van Panchayat organisations of villagers |
Forest Society, GOH & ICAR |
Various Co-operative |
Water users' |
Mohini Water |
8. Government departments involved directly |
Revenue & Forest |
Forest & Forest |
Agriculture |
Forest |
Irrigation |
9. Project performance as perceived by local people and outsiders |
Successful |
Successful |
Successful |
Successful |
Successful |
10. Level of people's participation as |
Medium to high |
High |
High |
High |
High |
1. GOM = Government of Maharashtra
2. GOH = Government of
Haryana
3. GOG = Government of Gujarat
4. ICAR = Indian Council of
Agricultural Research
5. FF = Ford Foundation
Table 2 Some key determinants of people's participation in managing common pool natural resources in five selected cases
Determinant |
Parwara Van Water |
Arabari Panchayat |
Ralegan Experiment |
Sukhomajri Siddhi |
Mohini |
Co-operative |
1. |
Private net benefits from participation |
High |
High |
High |
High |
High |
2. |
Stake of the co-users in the resource |
High |
High |
High |
High |
High |
3. Assurance about |
High access to benefits from participation |
Medium |
High |
Medium | |
High |
4. |
Quality of local leadership bad, now good |
Initially good, then average |
Initially good, now average |
Good all through |
Average all through |
Initially good, now |
5. |
Waiting time till some benefits became available |
Nil |
Nil |
One year |
One year |
Nil |
6. |
Size of the group of co-users of the resource |
Large |
Large |
Large |
Large |
Large |
7. |
Composition of the group of co-users but domination by a single caste |
Homogeneous |
Heterogeneous |
Homogeneous |
Heterogeneous |
Heterogeneous |
8. |
Existence of formal organisation of co-users |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
9. |
Existence of rules forregulation of res use and distribution of benefits |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
10. |
Legal back up of the rules |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
11. |
Enforcement of the rules |
Strict to lax |
Strict |
Strict |
Strict |
Strict to lax |
12. |
Extent of free riding and violation of rules |
Medium |
Low |
Nil |
Low |
Medium |
13. |
Existence of penalties for violation of rules |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
14. |
Role of government but paternalistic |
Facilitative |
Positive & facilitative |
Positive & facilitative |
Positive |
Positive & facilitative |
15. |
Role of non- governmental organisation (external) |
Nil |
Nil |
Positive & significant |
Positive & significant |
Nil |