Cover Image
close this bookPeople's Participation in Managing Common Pool Natural Resources : Lessons of Success in India (IRMA, 1992, 26 p.)
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentAbstract
View the documentIntroduction
View the documentA theoretical framework
View the documentMethodology
View the documentIndia's experience
View the documentThe Parwara van (forest) panchayat experience
View the documentThe Arabari experiment in joint forest management
View the documentThe Ralegan Siddhi project experience
View the documentThe Sukhomajri project experience
View the documentThe Mohini water co-operative experience
View the documentLessons and directions for future
View the documentAcknowledgement
View the documentReferences

References

Ballabh, V. & Katar Singh. (1988a). "Managing Forests through People's Institutions: A Case Study of Van Panchayats in Uttar Pradesh Hills". Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics. 43(3), pp. 296-304.

Ballabh, V. & Katar Singh. (1988b). "Van (Forest) Panchayats in Uttar Pradesh Hills: A Critical Analysis." Research Report 2. Anand: Institute of Rural Management.

Banki, Evan S. (1981). Dictionary of Administration and Management. Los Angeles, California: Systems Research Institute.

Buchanan, James M. & Tullock, Gordon. (1965). The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Chandra, N. Satish & Poffenberger, Mark. (1989). "Community Forestry Management in West Bengal: FPC Case Studies." In K. C. Malhotra, K.C., and Poffenberger, Mark. (Eds.) Forest Regeneration through Community Protection: The West Bengal Experience.Calcutta: West Bengal Forest Department.

Chopra, Kanchan, Kadekodi, Gopal K. & Murty, M.N. (1988). Sukhomajri and Dhamala Watersheds in Haryana: A Participatory Approach to Management. New Delhi: Institute of Economic Growth.

Guha, Ramchandra. (1985). "Forestry and Social Protests in Kumaon." Guha Ranjit (Ed.) Subaltern Studies. IV. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Olson, Mancur. (1971). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Rev. Ed. New York:Schocken Books.


Pangare, Ganesh & Pangare, Vasudha. (1991). Participatory Rural Development - Ralegan Siddhi: A Case Study, Mimeo. Anand: Institute of Rural Management.

Patil, R.K. (1988). Ralegan Siddhi: An Experience in Watershed Development. Bombay: Centre for Applied Systems Analysis in Development.

Mandalia, V.K. & Charan, A.S. (1989). "Management of Water by Mohini Water Co-operative Society of Gujarat State". Unpublished paper, Surat: South Gujarat University. A summary published in Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, July-Sept.1989, p.288.

Sarabhai, Kartikeya V. et al. (1990). Buffer Zone Restoration in India: Issues and Approaches. Ahmedabad: VIKSAT in collaboration with Centre for Environment Education.

Singh, Katar. (1991). Managing Common Pool Resources: Principles and Case Studies. Mimeo. Anand: Institute of Rural Management.

Trembley, Marc-Adelard. (1982). "The Key Informant Technique: A Non-Ethnographic Application". In Robert G. Burgess. (Ed.) Field Research: A Source Book and Field Manual. London: George Allen and Unwin.

Yin, Robert K. (1984). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. New Delhi/London: Sage Publications.

Table 1 A profile of the selected cases

Particular

Parwara Van

Arabari

Ralegan

Sukhomajri

Mohini


Water

Panchayat

Experiment

Siddhi

Co-operative

1. Uttar Pradesh

Location district West Bengal

Nainital district Maharashtra

Midnapur district Haryana

Ahmednagar district Gujarat

Ambala district

2. Year when the project was launched

1932

1972

1975

1979

1978

3. Number of villages covered

1

11

1

1

6

4. Total area covered under the project(ha)

249

1,272

972

4,085

525

5. Total population of the project area/ members (1981)

650

3,600

2,100

538

1,440

6. Source(s) of funds for the project Dept.

Villagers themselves FF

Forest Dept. & Rural Dev.

GOM,banks & Villagers

GOH GOG &

ICAR Members

7. Implementing agency Protection Committee & GOM

Van Panchayat organisations of villagers

Forest Society, GOH & ICAR

Various Co-operative

Water users'

Mohini Water

8. Government departments involved directly

Revenue & Forest

Forest & Forest

Agriculture

Forest

Irrigation

9. Project performance as perceived by local people and outsiders

Successful

Successful

Successful

Successful

Successful

10. Level of people's participation as

Medium to high

High

High

High

High

1. GOM = Government of Maharashtra
2. GOH = Government of Haryana
3. GOG = Government of Gujarat
4. ICAR = Indian Council of Agricultural Research
5. FF = Ford Foundation

Table 2 Some key determinants of people's participation in managing common pool natural resources in five selected cases

Determinant

Parwara Van Water

Arabari Panchayat

Ralegan Experiment

Sukhomajri Siddhi

Mohini

Co-operative

1.

Private net benefits from participation

High

High

High

High

High

2.

Stake of the co-users in the resource

High

High

High

High

High

3. Assurance about

High access to benefits from participation

Medium

High

Medium


High

4.

Quality of local leadership bad, now good

Initially good, then average

Initially good, now average

Good all through

Average all through

Initially good, now

5.

Waiting time till some benefits became available

Nil

Nil

One year

One year

Nil

6.

Size of the group of co-users of the resource

Large

Large

Large

Large

Large

7.

Composition of the group of co-users but domination by a single caste

Homogeneous

Heterogeneous

Homogeneous

Heterogeneous

Heterogeneous

8.

Existence of formal organisation of co-users

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

9.

Existence of rules forregulation of res use and distribution of benefits

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

10.

Legal back up of the rules

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

11.

Enforcement of the rules

Strict to lax

Strict

Strict

Strict

Strict to lax

12.

Extent of free riding and violation of rules

Medium

Low

Nil

Low

Medium

13.

Existence of penalties for violation of rules

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

14.

Role of government but paternalistic

Facilitative

Positive & facilitative

Positive & facilitative

Positive

Positive & facilitative

15.

Role of non- governmental organisation (external)

Nil

Nil

Positive & significant

Positive & significant

Nil