![]() | The Global Greenhouse Regime. Who Pays? (UNU, 1993, 382 p.) |
![]() | ![]() | List of contributors |
![]() | ![]() | Preface |
![]() | ![]() | Acknowledgements |
![]() | ![]() | Part I Measuring responsibility |
![]() | ![]() | 1 Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | The greenhouse effect |
![]() | ![]() | What was decided at Rio? |
![]() | ![]() | Protocol negotiating difficulties |
![]() | ![]() | Key issues for climate change negotiations |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | 2 The basics of greenhouse gas indices |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Apples and oranges |
![]() | ![]() | Implications |
![]() | ![]() | Conclusion: indices do matter |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | 3 Assessing emissions: five approaches compared |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Comprehensiveness compared |
![]() | ![]() | Accuracy by category |
![]() | ![]() | Regional and national emissions by source |
![]() | ![]() | Conclusions |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Appendix A: Estimates of greenhouse gas emissions |
![]() | ![]() | Appendix B: Calculating cumulative and current emissions |
![]() | ![]() | 4 Who pays (to solve the problem and how much)? |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Indices of allocation: a brief review |
![]() | ![]() | Accountability |
![]() | ![]() | Equity and efficiency |
![]() | ![]() | Conclusion |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Part II Resource transfers |
![]() | ![]() | 5 North-South carbon abatement costs |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Climate change convention |
![]() | ![]() | Method overview |
![]() | ![]() | Implications for the South |
![]() | ![]() | Notes and references |
![]() | ![]() | 6 North-South transfer |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Obligation to pay indices |
![]() | ![]() | Redistribution of incremental cost |
![]() | ![]() | Benchmarks |
![]() | ![]() | UN scale of payments |
![]() | ![]() | Financing mechanisms |
![]() | ![]() | Conclusion |
![]() | ![]() | Notes and references |
![]() | ![]() | 7 Insuring against sea level rise |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Insurability of losses |
![]() | ![]() | Oil pollution |
![]() | ![]() | Nuclear damage |
![]() | ![]() | Implications |
![]() | ![]() | The insurance scheme proposed by AOSIS |
![]() | ![]() | The Climate Change Convention |
![]() | ![]() | Notes and references |
![]() | ![]() | Appendix: Scheme proposed by AOSIS for inclusion in the Climate Change Convention |
![]() | ![]() | Part III National greenhouse gas reduction cost curves |
![]() | ![]() | 8 Integrating ecology and economy in India |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Emissions inventory |
![]() | ![]() | Energy efficiency and fuel substitution |
![]() | ![]() | Emissions and sequestration from forest biomass |
![]() | ![]() | Conclusions |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | 9 Carbon abatement potential in West Africa |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Long-term energy and carbon emissions scenarios |
![]() | ![]() | Options for rational energy use and carbon conservation |
![]() | ![]() | Economic opportunities for implementation |
![]() | ![]() | Policy issues for the region |
![]() | ![]() | Conclusions |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | 10 Abatement of carbon dioxide emissions in Brazil |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Brazil energy economy |
![]() | ![]() | Energy subsector analyses |
![]() | ![]() | Changing land-use trends |
![]() | ![]() | Conclusion |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | 11 Thailand's demand side management initiative: a practical response to global warming |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | End-use energy efficiency policies |
![]() | ![]() | Costs and benefits of the DSM master plan |
![]() | ![]() | CO2 reductions from the DSM Plan |
![]() | ![]() | Why should other developing countries adopt DSM? |
![]() | ![]() | The role of the multilateral development banks |
![]() | ![]() | Conclusions |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | 12 Carbon abatement in Central and Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Energy-environment nexus |
![]() | ![]() | Scenarios for the future |
![]() | ![]() | Country results |
![]() | ![]() | Policy implications |
![]() | ![]() | Conclusion |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | 13 Greenhouse gas emission abatement in Australia |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Abatement of energy sector emissions |
![]() | ![]() | Economic impact of abatement strategies |
![]() | ![]() | Non-energy emission abatement |
![]() | ![]() | Australia's international role |
![]() | ![]() | Carbon taxes, externalities and other policy instruments |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Part IV Conclusion |
![]() | ![]() | 14 Constructing a global greenhouse regime |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Conditionality and additionality |
![]() | ![]() | Technology transfer |
![]() | ![]() | Multi-pronged approach |
![]() | ![]() | Implementation procedures |
![]() | ![]() | Regional building blocks |
![]() | ![]() | North-'South' conflicts |
![]() | ![]() | Conclusion |
![]() | ![]() | Notes and references |
![]() | ![]() | Appendix: The Climate change convention |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Background |
![]() | ![]() | Climate change convention |
![]() | ![]() | Article 1. Definitions |
![]() | ![]() | Article 2. Objective |
![]() | ![]() | Article 3. Principles |
![]() | ![]() | Article 4 Commitments |
![]() | ![]() | Article 5. Research and systematic observation |
![]() | ![]() | Article 6. Education, training and public awareness |
![]() | ![]() | Article 7. Conference of the Parties |
![]() | ![]() | Article 8. Secretariat |
![]() | ![]() | Article 9. Subsidiary body for scientific and technological advice |
![]() | ![]() | Article 10. Subsidiary Body for implementation |
![]() | ![]() | Article 11. Financial mechanism |
![]() | ![]() | Article 12. Communication of information related to implementation |
![]() | ![]() | Article 13. Resolution of questions regarding implementation |
![]() | ![]() | Article 14. Settlement of disputes |
![]() | ![]() | Article 15. Amendments to the Convention |
![]() | ![]() | Article 16. Adoption and amendment of annexes to the Convention |
![]() | ![]() | Article 17. Protocols |
![]() | ![]() | Article 18. Right to vote |
![]() | ![]() | Article 19. Depositary |
![]() | ![]() | Article 20. Signature |
![]() | ![]() | Article 21. Interim arrangements |
![]() | ![]() | Article 22. Ratification, acceptance, approval or accession |
![]() | ![]() | Article 23. Entry into force |
![]() | ![]() | Article 24. Reservations |
![]() | ![]() | Article 25. Withdrawal |
![]() | ![]() | Article 26. Authentic texts |
According to this approach, substantial transfers to the South may be required to fund the technological and economic costs not covered by its own obligation to pay. These fall within the range $29-34 billion per year for thirty years, depending on the underlying marginal cost assumptions. Thirty billion dollars per year is a reasonable mid-point estimate of the justified, minimal and additional financing needed by the South to achieve its required reduction targets. To this amount should be added a substantial sum to 'kickstart' the sustainable development process by training the scientists and technicians who will be needed to implement an abatement strategy in the South.
Thirty billion dollars or more per year is a lot of money. For example, current official development assistance (ODA) for all energy investment in the South currently amounts to about $10 billion per year. Total ODA ran at about $30 billion per year during the 1980s (reaching $46.9 billion in 1989 for the OECD). Total foreign direct investment to all developing countries was about $13 billion per year in the same period. Enabling the South to participate in a global climate change agreement would result in transfers on a scale that would create a new foundation for the political-economic interdependence of the North and the South, on a scale with current aid and foreign investment.
Conversely, world and national GDP growing at 3 per cent per year will increase by 240 per cent over the same period, rendering the annual transfer cost a declining portion of donor country GDP. The transfer to the South of about $30 billion per year pales into insignificance compared with agricultural production subsidies ($50 billion per year in the EC); military spending in the North or the South; or Third World debt (which resulted in a South-to-North net financial flow of $42.9 billion in 1989). There is little doubt that the North can afford to pay $30 billion per year even if it would be difficult to muster the political will needed to do so.