![]() | The Global Greenhouse Regime. Who Pays? (UNU, 1993, 382 p.) |
![]() | ![]() | List of contributors |
![]() | ![]() | Preface |
![]() | ![]() | Acknowledgements |
![]() | ![]() | Part I Measuring responsibility |
![]() | ![]() | 1 Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | The greenhouse effect |
![]() | ![]() | What was decided at Rio? |
![]() | ![]() | Protocol negotiating difficulties |
![]() | ![]() | Key issues for climate change negotiations |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | 2 The basics of greenhouse gas indices |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Apples and oranges |
![]() | ![]() | Implications |
![]() | ![]() | Conclusion: indices do matter |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | 3 Assessing emissions: five approaches compared |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Comprehensiveness compared |
![]() | ![]() | Accuracy by category |
![]() | ![]() | Regional and national emissions by source |
![]() | ![]() | Conclusions |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Appendix A: Estimates of greenhouse gas emissions |
![]() | ![]() | Appendix B: Calculating cumulative and current emissions |
![]() | ![]() | 4 Who pays (to solve the problem and how much)? |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Indices of allocation: a brief review |
![]() | ![]() | Accountability |
![]() | ![]() | Equity and efficiency |
![]() | ![]() | Conclusion |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Part II Resource transfers |
![]() | ![]() | 5 North-South carbon abatement costs |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Climate change convention |
![]() | ![]() | Method overview |
![]() | ![]() | Implications for the South |
![]() | ![]() | Notes and references |
![]() | ![]() | 6 North-South transfer |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Obligation to pay indices |
![]() | ![]() | Redistribution of incremental cost |
![]() | ![]() | Benchmarks |
![]() | ![]() | UN scale of payments |
![]() | ![]() | Financing mechanisms |
![]() | ![]() | Conclusion |
![]() | ![]() | Notes and references |
![]() | ![]() | 7 Insuring against sea level rise |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Insurability of losses |
![]() | ![]() | Oil pollution |
![]() | ![]() | Nuclear damage |
![]() | ![]() | Implications |
![]() | ![]() | The insurance scheme proposed by AOSIS |
![]() | ![]() | The Climate Change Convention |
![]() | ![]() | Notes and references |
![]() | ![]() | Appendix: Scheme proposed by AOSIS for inclusion in the Climate Change Convention |
![]() | ![]() | Part III National greenhouse gas reduction cost curves |
![]() | ![]() | 8 Integrating ecology and economy in India |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Emissions inventory |
![]() | ![]() | Energy efficiency and fuel substitution |
![]() | ![]() | Emissions and sequestration from forest biomass |
![]() | ![]() | Conclusions |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | 9 Carbon abatement potential in West Africa |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Long-term energy and carbon emissions scenarios |
![]() | ![]() | Options for rational energy use and carbon conservation |
![]() | ![]() | Economic opportunities for implementation |
![]() | ![]() | Policy issues for the region |
![]() | ![]() | Conclusions |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | 10 Abatement of carbon dioxide emissions in Brazil |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Brazil energy economy |
![]() | ![]() | Energy subsector analyses |
![]() | ![]() | Changing land-use trends |
![]() | ![]() | Conclusion |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | 11 Thailand's demand side management initiative: a practical response to global warming |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | End-use energy efficiency policies |
![]() | ![]() | Costs and benefits of the DSM master plan |
![]() | ![]() | CO2 reductions from the DSM Plan |
![]() | ![]() | Why should other developing countries adopt DSM? |
![]() | ![]() | The role of the multilateral development banks |
![]() | ![]() | Conclusions |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | 12 Carbon abatement in Central and Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Energy-environment nexus |
![]() | ![]() | Scenarios for the future |
![]() | ![]() | Country results |
![]() | ![]() | Policy implications |
![]() | ![]() | Conclusion |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | 13 Greenhouse gas emission abatement in Australia |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Abatement of energy sector emissions |
![]() | ![]() | Economic impact of abatement strategies |
![]() | ![]() | Non-energy emission abatement |
![]() | ![]() | Australia's international role |
![]() | ![]() | Carbon taxes, externalities and other policy instruments |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Part IV Conclusion |
![]() | ![]() | 14 Constructing a global greenhouse regime |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Conditionality and additionality |
![]() | ![]() | Technology transfer |
![]() | ![]() | Multi-pronged approach |
![]() | ![]() | Implementation procedures |
![]() | ![]() | Regional building blocks |
![]() | ![]() | North-'South' conflicts |
![]() | ![]() | Conclusion |
![]() | ![]() | Notes and references |
![]() | ![]() | Appendix: The Climate change convention |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Background |
![]() | ![]() | Climate change convention |
![]() | ![]() | Article 1. Definitions |
![]() | ![]() | Article 2. Objective |
![]() | ![]() | Article 3. Principles |
![]() | ![]() | Article 4 Commitments |
![]() | ![]() | Article 5. Research and systematic observation |
![]() | ![]() | Article 6. Education, training and public awareness |
![]() | ![]() | Article 7. Conference of the Parties |
![]() | ![]() | Article 8. Secretariat |
![]() | ![]() | Article 9. Subsidiary body for scientific and technological advice |
![]() | ![]() | Article 10. Subsidiary Body for implementation |
![]() | ![]() | Article 11. Financial mechanism |
![]() | ![]() | Article 12. Communication of information related to implementation |
![]() | ![]() | Article 13. Resolution of questions regarding implementation |
![]() | ![]() | Article 14. Settlement of disputes |
![]() | ![]() | Article 15. Amendments to the Convention |
![]() | ![]() | Article 16. Adoption and amendment of annexes to the Convention |
![]() | ![]() | Article 17. Protocols |
![]() | ![]() | Article 18. Right to vote |
![]() | ![]() | Article 19. Depositary |
![]() | ![]() | Article 20. Signature |
![]() | ![]() | Article 21. Interim arrangements |
![]() | ![]() | Article 22. Ratification, acceptance, approval or accession |
![]() | ![]() | Article 23. Entry into force |
![]() | ![]() | Article 24. Reservations |
![]() | ![]() | Article 25. Withdrawal |
![]() | ![]() | Article 26. Authentic texts |
energy-environment nexus
scenarios for the
future
country results
policy
implications
conclusion
references
stanislav f kolar
the countries of central and eastern europe consume more than 6 per cent of the world's primary energy and release more than 7 per cent of global carbon dioxide emissions. the republics of the former soviet union (fsu) consume 16 per cent of the world's energy, and release 15 per cent of the carbon. on a per capita basis, their consumption of energy is similar to that of the industrialized economies in western europe. central planners in the former socialist bloc countries often measured success by the amount of energy produced and consumed by their economies. but they did not mention that their rations' per capita income was two to three times lower than in western europe. simple arithmetic indicates that the economies of the former socialist bloc use two to three times as much energy to produce one unit of national income (see figure 12.1).
the asymmetrical economic development in central and eastern europe, initiated in 1928 in the fsu by the first five-year plan and in the late 1940s in central europe and the balkans, is largely responsible for the region's high energy intensity. the economic theories of rapid industrialization that were implemented in these countries considered energy consumption as a means towards achieving strategic goals, such as producing a given amount of steel, cement, chemicals, and other products, many of them requiring vast inputs of energy. fulfilling the production of these products had always been the first priority, and resources were allocated to ensure that such production could take place. to make the production cycle function as smoothly as possible, both energy production and energy prices were heavily subsidized.
Figure 12.1 Carbon and energy intensities compared, 1988 (indexes of
carbon and energy/$GDP)
Coupled with the lack of market incentives, this situation created obvious disincentives to use energy rationally.