2.3.2 Role of local government agencies
If local government agencies are excluded from the formative
stages of project design and implementation, they may be reluctant to accept
responsibility for maintenance. This problem resulted in the inability to
consolidate innovative new shelter projects and recover project costs in Papua
New Guinea (Payne, 1982b). The only solution to this problem is to ensure that
local authorities are introduced to the underlying principles of innovative
projects at the earliest stage in their development. Even then, it may be
difficult for local authorities to undertake the tasks required of them, due to
a lack of institutional capability, or cumbersome procedures. In Colombia, for
example, administrative procedures concerning contract tendering require a
minimum number of bids, below which tenders are not accepted and the whole
process has to begin again, with a resulting delay and increase of costs. Given
that large-scale contractors may not be too enthusiastic about undertaking
projects for low-income groups in the first place, such a situation is not
uncommon. To exacerbate this problem further, all contracts have to be approved
by the Administrative Court, which functions independently of the district
administration, but is considerably overloaded. This process alone can add
6-12-months to project preparation (Utria, 1990: 41). Similarly, in the Bolivar
City project, it appears that inadequate attention was given to operational
planning, or the implementation process. This necessitated changes to the
project after implementation had commenced, resulting in further delays and
increased costs (Utria, 1990: 48).
One reason for the limited capability of public agencies is the
lack of adequately qualified and motivated professional staff. In the Zimbabwean
projects, a shortage of land surveyors, together with inappropriately high
standards slowed down site development and consequently raised project costs
(Mutizwa-Mangiza, 1990: 46). Yet, the picture is not totally negative. In the
MHP in Sri Lanka, the development of institutional mechanisms at the local
authority level was an integral element in its success. These enabled NHDA to
offer construction contracts to community groups rather than to private
construction companies, thereby reducing administrative costs from 30 to 15 per
cent (UNCHS, 1987:45), not to mention the other benefits of community
involvement. It is not clear, however, if this includes the cost of technical
assistance from project staff which placed considerable demands on staff
resources. One major difficulty with the MHP is related to the financial terms,
under which interest rates varied between 6 and 10 per cent in
sites-and-services and other low-income projects. This represented a substantial
subsidy, to which was added subsidies on land and land-development costs, the
provision of basic infrastructure and community facilities. No mechanism for
recovering the cost of land development and infrastructure was established under
the MHP. The total cost of these elements has routinely been borne by the
Government (Jayaratne, 1990: 43). The present value of the interest-rate subsidy
alone in the rural programme is greater than the present value of the loan
amount. Channels for obtaining housing loans are limited and not accessible to
the poor because of collateral and deposit
requirements.