![]() | Sustaining the Future. Economic, Social, and Environmental Change in Sub-Saharan Africa (UNU, 1996, 365 p.) |
![]() | ![]() | Note to the reader from the UNU |
![]() | ![]() | Preface |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Background |
![]() | ![]() | Regional environmental futures |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Opening address by the Hon. Minister of Environment, Science and Technology |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Economy and society: Development issues |
![]() | ![]() | Environmental issues and futures |
![]() | ![]() | Environment and resource management |
![]() | ![]() | Institutional issues |
![]() | ![]() | Environment and development in Ghana |
![]() | ![]() | Recommendations |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Part 1: Economy and society: development issues |
![]() | ![]() | Poverty, vulnerability, and rural development |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | The nature of poverty |
![]() | ![]() | Rural poverty and development in Sub-Saharan Africa |
![]() | ![]() | Aspects of economy and society in SS Africa |
![]() | ![]() | Vulnerability |
![]() | ![]() | Poverty and economic reform |
![]() | ![]() | Conclusion |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Environmental management and social equity |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | The key notions |
![]() | ![]() | The political-economic context of contemporary environmental management |
![]() | ![]() | Social equity and environmental management: Some examples |
![]() | ![]() | The way forward |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction to population, resources, and sustainable development in Sub-Saharan Africa |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Internal and international migration |
![]() | ![]() | Natural resources |
![]() | ![]() | Human resources |
![]() | ![]() | Population, agricultural land, and food supply |
![]() | ![]() | Population, economy, and sustainable development |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Urbanization and industrialization: What future for Sub-Saharan Africa? |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | The continuing rapid rate and scale of urbanization |
![]() | ![]() | The urban environment |
![]() | ![]() | The limitations of industrialization |
![]() | ![]() | The impact of structural adjustment |
![]() | ![]() | Sub-Saharan Africa as the global periphery |
![]() | ![]() | Implications for urbanization and industrialization |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Urban environmental management and issues in Africa south of the Sahara |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | The process of urbanization in Sub-Saharan Africa |
![]() | ![]() | The nature of environmental problems |
![]() | ![]() | Causes of the current problems |
![]() | ![]() | The way forward |
![]() | ![]() | Concluding remarks |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Part 2: Environmental issues and futures |
![]() | ![]() | Towards sustainable environmental and resource management futures in Sub-Saharan Africa |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | The concept of sustainable development and its implications |
![]() | ![]() | Driving forces |
![]() | ![]() | Levels of environmental effects of human activities and sustainability concerns |
![]() | ![]() | Constraints on sustainable development in Sub-Saharan Africa |
![]() | ![]() | Recommendations |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Drought, desertification, and water management in Sub-Saharan Africa |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Droughts in Sub-Saharan Africa and their implications for planning and development |
![]() | ![]() | Desertification |
![]() | ![]() | Land degradation and management of soil and water |
![]() | ![]() | Conclusion |
![]() | ![]() | Acknowledgements |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Tropical deforestation and its impact on soil, environment, and agricultural productivity |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | TRF and its conversion |
![]() | ![]() | Soils of the TRF ecosystem |
![]() | ![]() | Forest conversion and soil productivity |
![]() | ![]() | Deforestation and the emission of radiatively active gases |
![]() | ![]() | Deforestation and hydrological balance |
![]() | ![]() | Sustainable use of the TRF ecosystem |
![]() | ![]() | Research needs |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | The coastal zone and oceanic problems of Sub-Saharan Africa |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | The value of the coastal zone and oceans |
![]() | ![]() | The main problems and their causes |
![]() | ![]() | Remedies |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Part 3: Environment and resource management |
![]() | ![]() | Agricultural development in the age of sustainability: Crop production |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | The ecological zones of Sub-Saharan Africa |
![]() | ![]() | General crop production constraints and potentials for overcoming them |
![]() | ![]() | Technologies with potential for sustainable resource management |
![]() | ![]() | Women's underexploited potential |
![]() | ![]() | Suggested approaches to sustainable production |
![]() | ![]() | Summary |
![]() | ![]() | Conclusions |
![]() | ![]() | Acknowledgements |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Agricultural development in the age of sustainability: Livestock production |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Livestock production, productivity, and feed resources |
![]() | ![]() | The effect of government policy on livestock production |
![]() | ![]() | Suggested solutions |
![]() | ![]() | Summary and conclusions |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | The fuelwood/energy crisis in Sub-Saharan Africa |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Population and environmental concerns |
![]() | ![]() | The primary energy sector in Sub-Saharan Africa |
![]() | ![]() | Problems of the energy sector in Sub-Saharan Africa |
![]() | ![]() | The socio-economic implications of the fuelwood crisis |
![]() | ![]() | Strategies to combat the fuelwood crisis Strategies to combst the fuelwood crisis |
![]() | ![]() | New and renewable energy development |
![]() | ![]() | Conclusion |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | The case for mineral resources management and development in Sub-Saharan Africa |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Part 4: Institutional issues |
![]() | ![]() | Modes of international and regional research cooperation |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | The global change programmes |
![]() | ![]() | Networking |
![]() | ![]() | Environmental governance |
![]() | ![]() | Outlook |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | National, regional, and international cooperation for sustainable environmental and resource management: The place and roles of NGOs |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Information sharing |
![]() | ![]() | Partnerships with other institutions |
![]() | ![]() | Dialogues with governmental and industry organs |
![]() | ![]() | Linking with policy institutions |
![]() | ![]() | Working with monitoring institutions for effective implementation and accountability |
![]() | ![]() | Conclusion |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Part 5: Environment and development in Ghana |
![]() | ![]() | Institutional issues on the environment and resource management with reference to Ghana |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Early developments |
![]() | ![]() | The Stockholm Conference and after |
![]() | ![]() | The Environmental Action Plan (EAP) |
![]() | ![]() | Institutional problems and issues |
![]() | ![]() | The implementation of the Environmental Action Plan |
![]() | ![]() | Conclusion |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | The environmental impact and sustainability of plantations in Sub-Saharan Africa: Ghana's experiences with oil-palm plantations |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Overview of the plantation system in the Sub-Sahara |
![]() | ![]() | The evolution of plantations in Ghana |
![]() | ![]() | The positive impacts of the plantations |
![]() | ![]() | Adverse environmental impacts and sustainability |
![]() | ![]() | Conclusion |
![]() | ![]() | References |
![]() | ![]() | Contributors |
One thing in common between all the above and other similar efforts is that they are based on a networking principle. International networks of research and training institutions as well as individual scholars are set up in order to agree on a joint research agenda, to focus efforts, and to benefit from economies of scale. The networks also have the central function of capacity-building in developing countries.
To demonstrate this point, consider international cooperation in agricultural research. One of the questions is whether our present concepts of international and national resources research as related to African farmers are still capable of meeting the challenges of the more systemic approach that is now required.
Much of the research is based on cooperation between the centres within the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR), national research bodies, and actors at the "grass-roots" level. The main function of international centres such as the International Institute for Tropical Agriculture (IITA) or the International Livestock Centre for Africa (ILCA) and their related networks seems to be to provide technologies that in a second step could be adapted to national and local conditions. This strategy has been largely successful, and some national administrations have been able to adopt the right research topics at the user level.
In many national research systems, however, this does not work because of the lack of trained professional staff, limited funding, and other administrative and fiscal obstacles. It has also been difficult to introduce priority problems from the farmers' and resource users' level into the research agendas of the international bodies. Investigations have shown time and again that, particularly as regards the small traditional peasant farmer, there still exist great problems of acceptance (Hatch 1976; Chambers 1983; Jazairy et al. 1992). The technological application gap seems to be as wide as ever, and much of the extension work of past decades has not been very successful (Merrill-Sands 1986).
From the farmers' point of view, the world looks very different compared with an international expert's view. Innovations may be refused because too much risk is involved or because they do not fit within the socio-economic reality of the farmers' environment. Risk minimization is of central importance to smallholders, who by processes of trial and error have generally acquired long experience in resource management, which they will not easily give up for something unknown, however promising.
What is needed is an even stronger reorientation of at least some of the international research towards the level of smallholders' problems, including a better appraisal of their traditional knowledge. Several of the new initiatives, including UNU/INRA and PLEC, are designed with this in mind.
This approach, which has been accepted for some time, also calls for increased interdisciplinary cooperation, including social scientists. A number of new concepts have been tried out during the past 10-20 years. The work on farming systems research (Shaner et al. 1982), on on-farm research (Byerlee and Collinson 1980), on the "farmer-firstand-last" model (Chambers and Ghildyal 1985), and on on-farm clientoriented research (Merrill-Sands and McAllister 1989) may serve as examples.
A participatory approach will improve the probability that internationally advocated technological innovations will eventually be adopted at the local and national levels. It is to be hoped that UNU/ INRA can also make a substantial contribution here.
Another example of successful research networking for capacitybuilding in developing countries is the UNU-International Mountain Society programme on Mountain Ecology and Sustainable Development. The programme has been operational since 1978 and, in recognition of its contribution in the field, it was selected to prepare the UNCED mountain agenda (Stone 1992). One of the central objectives since its initiation has been institutional support to mountain and highlands research in developing countries. For example, the programme was instrumental in establishing the African Mountain Association, which is now a fairly self-sufficient network of mountain researchers from Africa. The mother programme continues to support the global as well as regional networking activities through the journal Mountain Research and Development and newsletters.