![]() | Sustainable Development and Persons with Disabilities: The Process of Self-Empowerment (ADF, 1995, 117 p.) |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | About the author |
![]() | ![]() | Foreword |
![]() | ![]() | Foreword |
![]() | ![]() | Abbreviations |
![]() | ![]() | Sources and acknowledgements |
![]() | ![]() | Section I: Understanding and perception |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Chapter 1: Introduction |
![]() | ![]() | Objectives of this guide |
![]() | ![]() | Who may use the guide |
![]() | ![]() | Language and liberation |
![]() | ![]() | Debate and discussion must continue |
![]() | ![]() | Chapter 2: An integrated approach to sustainable development for persons with disability |
![]() | ![]() | Chapter 3: The enabling environment: SAPs, development and disability |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Action guidelines |
![]() | ![]() | Appendix 1: Structural adjustment programme (SAP) - The experience of Zambia |
![]() | ![]() | Chapter 4: Community-based rehabilitation |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Practices in relation to the PWDs |
![]() | ![]() | What is CBR? |
![]() | ![]() | Case studies |
![]() | ![]() | A general assessment of CBR: Possibilities and limitations |
![]() | ![]() | Action guidelines |
![]() | ![]() | Section II: Building economic self-reliance |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Chapter 5: Building economic self-reliance |
![]() | ![]() | The importance of self-reliance |
![]() | ![]() | Employment options for PWDs |
![]() | ![]() | Group versus individually designed and managed IGPs |
![]() | ![]() | IGPs at the crossroads of gender and class |
![]() | ![]() | Action guidelines |
![]() | ![]() | Chapter 6: Income generating project planning |
![]() | ![]() | The importance of planning |
![]() | ![]() | The experience of a clothing manufacturing project run by a PWD organisation |
![]() | ![]() | Other lessons to learn from other experiences |
![]() | ![]() | Recommendations of the entebbe workshop |
![]() | ![]() | What is involved in successful planning |
![]() | ![]() | What kind of information is needed for planning? |
![]() | ![]() | What do we do with all this information? |
![]() | ![]() | Action guidelines |
![]() | ![]() | Chapter 7: Implementation and resource mobilisation |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Sustainability |
![]() | ![]() | Resource mobilisation |
![]() | ![]() | Running an enterprise |
![]() | ![]() | Some case studies of projects run by PWDs |
![]() | ![]() | Action guidelines |
![]() | ![]() | Appendix 1: Revolving loan scheme (RLS) |
![]() | ![]() | Appendix 2: The Entebbe workshop resolution con RLS |
![]() | ![]() | Chapter 8: Monitoring and evaluation: Measuring the success of IGPs |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Monitoring |
![]() | ![]() | Evaluation |
![]() | ![]() | Methodology of monitoring and evaluation |
![]() | ![]() | Action guidelines |
![]() | ![]() | Chapter 9: Capacity building: Skills training and institution building |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Empowerment |
![]() | ![]() | The pedagogy of disability training |
![]() | ![]() | Women with disabilities and capacity building for IGPs |
![]() | ![]() | Action guidelines |
![]() | ![]() | Section III: Lobbying, networking and building alliances |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | Chapter 10: Strategies for lobbying, networking and building alliances |
![]() | ![]() | PWDs are their own principal change agents |
![]() | ![]() | Lobbying, advocacy and networking |
![]() | ![]() | Broad alliances |
![]() | ![]() | Action guidelines |
![]() | ![]() | Notes and references |
![]() | ![]() | (introduction...) |
![]() | ![]() | ADF board of directors |
An on-going process of continuous monitoring of the project is essential if the problems are to be identified early enough before they get worse, and solutions found to them. Monitoring the performance of a project (or enterprise) is an important management tool. Evaluation, on the other hand, is a more long term tool of analysis of the performance of the project. It tests the project against its intended objectives. Let us illustrate.