Cover Image
close this bookExporting High-Value Food Commodities: Success Stories from Developing Countries (WB, 1993, 119 p.)
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentForeword
View the documentAcknowledgments
View the documentExecutive summary
View the documentI. Introduction
close this folderII. Economic and institutional issues in the marketing of high-value foods
View the documentMarketing high-value food products
View the documentFood commodity systems: Organization. coordination, and performance
close this folderCommodity system competitiveness
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentDeterminants of competitiveness
close this folderGeneric barriers to entry and coordination in food commodity systems
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentFood product technical characteristics
View the documentFood commodity production characteristics
View the documentProduction support by marketing enterprises
View the documentProcessing and distribution functions
close this folderTechnologies, institutions. and other solutions to generic food marketing problems
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentTechnological measures
View the documentLaws, rules, and standards
View the documentSpot marketing trading
View the documentReputations, brand names and advertising
View the documentPersonalized trading networks
View the documentBrokerage
View the documentContract coordination
View the documentCooperatives/associations/voluntary chains
View the documentVertical integration
View the documentGovernment intervention
close this folderIII. Synthesis high-value food commodity system ''Success stories''
View the document(introduction...)
close this folderSelected dimensions of commodity systems performance
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentCost advantages and product/service differentiation
View the documentAdditional performance indicators
View the documentInternational market environment
View the documentMacroeconomic conditions. human capital. and infrastructure
View the documentGovernment support and interventions
close this folderCommodity system organization coordination
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentCompetitive structure
View the documentInstitutional arrangements linking producers with processors/exporters
View the documentInstitutional arrangements linking exporters with foreign markets
View the documentForeign capital and technology in the case study subsectors
View the documentIV. Summary and lessons
View the documentBibliography
close this folderAppendix The development and performance of case study commodity systems
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentMexico fresh tomatoes
View the documentKenya 'off-season' and specialty fresh vegetables
View the documentIsrael fresh citrus fruit
View the documentBrazil frozen concentrated orange juice
View the documentChile temperate fruits and processed tomato products
View the documentProcessed tomato products
View the documentArgentina beef
View the documentThailand poultry
View the documentThailand tuna
View the documentChile fisheries
View the documentCultured shrimp production and trade in China and Thailand
View the documentSoybean development in Brazil and Argentina
View the documentDemand-driven agricultural diversification in Taiwan (China)
close this folderDistributors of World Bank Publications
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentRecent world bank discussion papers

Institutional arrangements linking producers with processors/exporters

3.48 In the focal commodity systems, various institutional arrangements have been developed to coordinate raw material production with processing and other downstream requirements. These patterns are summarized in Table 15, which represents a 'snapshot' of important institutional arrangements prevailing in the late 1980s. The Table indicates that while in the majority of cases there are open market linkages between some producers and processors/exporters, only in two cases is arms-length trade the dominant mode of raw material procurement. In the case of Argentine beef, a well-established system of auctions, terminal markets, and brokerage arrangements (dating back more than 50 years) facilitates a steady and massive movement of cattle from producers to slaughterhouses and processors. In the case of Thai tuna, Bangkok's fish markets have become amongst the largest and well-developed in Southeast Asia, providing Thai canners with a steady and large supply of different tuna species caught both in the Indian and Pacific Oceans. In all other cases, market coordination has been supplemented or replaced by a combination of other modes of vertical coordination, including seasonal (or longer term) contracts, ownership integration, cooperative coordination, and/or government coordination.

Table 15: Institutional Arrangements Linking Producers with Processors/Exporters

Commodity System

Market Coordination

Contract Coordination

Ownership Integration

Cooperative/ Association Coordination

Gov't Coordination

Mexico

X

X

XX

X

X

Tomatoes






Kenya Fresh

X

X

X



Vegetable






Chile Temperate


XX

X

X


Fruit






Israel Fresh


XX


X

X

Citrus






Chile Processed

X

XX




Tomatoes






Brazil FCOJ


XX

X


X

Thailand Poultry

X

XX

X



Argentina Beef

XX

X

X



Chile Fish

X

X

X

X


(Meal/Oil)






Thailand Tuna

XX

X



X

Thailand Cultured


XX

X

X


Shrimp






China Cultured


X

X


X

Shrimp






Taiwan (China)






Pork

X

X


X


Vegetables

X

XX


X


Brazil Soybean

X



X


Argentina Soybean

X

XX


X


XX denotes the dominant linkage in the industry

3.49 Contractual coordination is important in all of the case studies involving fresh and processed fruit and vegetables as well as in the Thai poultry and shrimp sub-sectors. While the actual contractual arrangements vary, most feature the supply of credit and/or production inputs, a forward or formula pricing mechanism, and specifications regarding the quantity, quality, and timing of producer deliveries. Such arrangements have improved the flow of information, technologies, money, and physical commodities between producers and processor/exporters and facilitated a sharing of production and/or market risks.

3.50 Many of the subsectors feature at least some vertical integration between production and downstream activities. This has normally been undertaken by relatively large processing/trading firms in order to reduce raw material supply risks and costs or by larger farmers seeking to capture a larger share of the export revenues. In both the Thai poultry and shrimp cases, individual firms have developed operations integrating feed supply, production, processing, and trade. In many cases, processors have combined own production with contracted outgrower supplies so to achieve a preferred mix of cost economizing and risk spreading. In general, the export-oriented components of individual sub-sectors have exhibited far more 'intensive vertical coordination than production and trade for domestic markets. However, in many cases the contractual and other coordinating methods used by exporters are being increasingly adopted in the domestic market, especially by producers and firms targeting higher-quality, higher-price market segments.

3.51 Cooperatives or producer and trade associations have played an important marketing and coordination role in several of the case study commodity systems. In the Mexican case, both the National Union of Vegetable Producers and the Confederation of Agricultural Associations of the State of Sinaloa have played important coordinating roles, not only through their assignment of acreage and export quotas, but also in their dissemination of market information, their assistance in agricultural inputs procurement, their enforcement of tomato quality standards, and their liaisons with government water authorities. In Taiwan (China), cooperatives have played a very important role in the domestic marketing of smallholder fruit, vegetable, and pork production and in the exports of fresh fruit and vegetables. The same holds true in the Argentine and Brazilian soybean sub-sectors. Producer and trader associations have been active in establishing quality standards, negotiating producer prices, and settling disputes in the cases of Chilean fruit and fish and Thai shrimp.

3.52 In several cases, government trading or regulatory agencies have played a role in coordinating production and downstream operations. The pattern for Mexican tomato exports has already been discussed. In Israel, the Citrus Marketing Board gave annual supply quotas (specifying quantities, varieties, and delivery times) to a limited number of private or cooperative packing/production companies which in turn had annual supply agreements with many individual farmers. In Brazil, the government periodically intervened in negotiations and disputes between growers and processors, seeking to work out appropriate methods for allocating market risks and determining producer prices. In the case of Thai tuna processing, the Thai government has coordinated government controlled fresh tuna supplies from the Maldive Islands.