Cover Image
close this bookCase Studies of People's Participation in Watershed Management in Asia (PWMTA, 1996)
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentAbbreviations
View the documentLocal terms
View the documentForeword
close this folderA case study of people's participation in Begnastal and Rupatal (BTRT) watershed management in Nepal
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentAbstract
close this folderIntroduction
View the documentBackground
View the documentStudy site selection
View the documentObjectives of the study
close this folderReview
close this folderOverview of the study area
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentClimate
View the documentVegetation
View the documentLand use
View the documentLivestock
View the documentSocio-economic conditions
close this folderThe concepts and mechanisms of people's participation
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentNo participation model
View the documentInformation sharing model
View the documentPolitical participation model
View the documentUsers' participation model
View the documentIndividual participation model
View the documentReview of people's participation in watershed management in the western development region
View the documentMethodology
close this folderResult and discussions
close this folderEvolution of participation
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentFirst stage (1974-80)
View the documentSecond stage (1981-85)
View the documentThird stage (1986-90)
View the documentFourth stage (1991-94)
close this folderActivities of the Begnastal Rupatal watershed management project
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentFirst phase (1985-89)
View the documentSecond phase (1990-94)
close this folderConsequences of the BTRT project
View the documentInvolvement of women, occupational castes and other minority groups
View the documentManagement of forests
View the documentManagement of private and community lands
close this folderInfluences of the BTRT project on people's participation
View the documentCommunity development and organization
View the documentCommunity development board
View the documentLocal club
close this folderResult of people's participation in the BTRT area
View the documentChanges and improvements in land use
View the documentEconomic benefits
View the documentChanges in land productivity
View the documentUsers' involvement in watershed management
View the documentAccess to credit
View the documentInnovations by neighbouring farmers
View the documentProblems and constraints
close this folderConclusions and recommendations
View the documentConclusions
close this folderPolicy recommendations
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentUnit of watershed management
View the documentUsers and their organizations
View the documentGender equality
View the documentIndigenous technology
View the documentWatershed resource assessment
View the documentDevelopment of local capabilities
View the documentSharing information and coordinating activities
View the documentTraining
View the documentOther recommendations
View the documentAcknowledgement
View the documentReferences
close this folderA case study of successful watershed management in Wuhua County, Guangdong Province, China
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentAbstract
close this folderIntroduction
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentPurpose of the study
View the documentJustification for study site selection
View the documentMethodology
close this folderDescription of Wuhua County
View the documentEnvironmental and socio-economic conditions
View the documentTopography
close this folderClimate
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentPrecipitation
close this folderSoil and water erosion
View the documentTypes of soil erosion
View the documentSome important features of soil erosion
View the documentVegetation
close this folderRelations between vegetation and soil erosion
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentSoil types susceptible to erosion
View the documentHydrology
View the documentSedimentation
View the documentEnvironmental damage
close this folderMechanisms of people's participation
View the document(introduction...)
close this folderFamily contract system
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentCollective or group contract system
View the documentSub-Lease contract system
View the documentProfessional contract system
View the documentSpecialized contract system
close this folderSoil and water conservation strategy
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentStrategic decisions of the provincial government
View the documentStrategies for implementing comprehensive management of small watersheds
close this folderWatershed management planning
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentThe principles of planning
close this folderAchievements
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentVegetative measures
View the documentEngineering measures
close this folderAdministration for people's participation and research support
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentAdministration
View the documentResearch support
close this folderThe case of benefits from land leasing contractual arrangements for people's participation in WUPI watershed
View the document(introduction...)
close this folderThe Wupi small watershed
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentSome features of soil erosion in Wupi watershed
close this folderComprehensive erosion control measures at Wupi watershed
View the documentA brief history
View the documentSoil erosion control measures
View the documentReduction in fuel-wood shortage
close this folderContractual arrangements for people's participation
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentWater control measures
View the documentMeasures to improve farmland
close this folderBenefits of soil conservation
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentEcological benefits
View the documentSocial benefits
close this folderResults of improved land use management in Wuhua county
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentEconomic benefits
View the documentAcknowledgement
View the documentBibliography
close this folderA successful case of participatory watershed management at Ralegan Siddhi Village in district Ahmadnagar, Maharastra, India*
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentAbstract
close this folderAn overview of people's participation in natural resource management in India
View the documentBreakdown of traditional sustainable systems
View the documentParticipation of resource poor farmers
View the documentPrejudice against women
close this folderRecent prominent initiatives of people's participation in resource management
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentNaxalite movement
View the documentChipko movement
View the documentSave Narmada movement (Andolan)
View the documentBodh Gaya Andolan
View the documentGanga liberation (Mukti) Andolan
View the documentAVARD'S irrigation schemes
View the documentWater council (Pani Panchayat)
View the documentSukhomajri
View the documentRope makers of saharanpur
View the documentChakriya Vikas pranali (the cyclic system of development)
View the documentMYRADA's self-help groups
View the documentRural labor association of Halpati Sava Sangh
View the documentRalegan Siddhi
View the documentSelf-Help groups by Taj Mahal gram Bikas Kendra
View the documentMahila Vikas Sangh (women development federation)
View the documentSelf employed women's association
close this folderThe case of people's participation in watershed management in Ralegan Siddhi
View the document(introduction...)
close this folderDescription
View the documentThe physical setting
View the documentDemographic features
View the documentSocio-economic structure
View the documentBase-line situation
close this folderApproaches/methods used for people's participation
View the document(introduction...)
View the documentPersuasion
View the documentGandhian approach
View the documentCreation of a common platform
View the documentMoral cleansing
View the documentSelfless leadership
View the documentIdentification of the most pressing common problem
View the documentInitiating the process of change at individual level
View the documentSocialization of costs and surpluses
View the documentDemocratic decision making process
View the documentSocial reform with strict discipline
View the documentNeed-based planned socio-economic development
View the documentCooperative management system
View the documentSpecial focus on women
View the documentFacilitating village organizations
View the documentReflections on the experience and insights gained
close this folderLessons, achievements, weaknesses and constraints
View the documentLessons
View the documentAchievements at Ralegan Siddhi
View the documentWeaknesses
View the documentConstraints
View the documentConclusion
View the documentAcknowledgement

Abstract

The Begnas Tal (lake) and Rupa Tal (BTRT) watershed area is located at about 10 km east of Pokhara in Western Nepal which is about 200 km west of Kathmandu. The watershed covers an area of 173 km2 of two main lakes Begnas and Rupa and three other minor lakes. There are seven Village Development Committees (VDC) in the BTRT. About 31,000 people inhabit in the BTRT area.

For the last ten years, the BTRT Project has been concentrating its efforts on watershed management using participatory approaches. Hence, it is thought to be the best area for studying participatory approaches in watershed management in Nepal. In the BTRT Project area, participatory approach is mandatory for all activities at all stages, today. Local people are actively involved in planning, implementing, follow-up, and maintaining community watershed resources. The role of watershed management technicians is relegated to that of technical facilitators.

Communities are organized in order to ensure peoples' participation. Community Development Conservation Committees (CDCC), instead of users' groups, are the organizational unit. A CDCC serves a community as a natural socio-ecological unit. It is not defined by a VDC or a VDC hamlet (called ward in Nepal) boundary. Each household in the community is represented in the CDCC. At the project's initiation, a CDCC analyzes its problems using a participatory community approach and then presents its conservation needs to the project office. As of the end of 1994 there were 100 CDCCs in operation in the BTRT area.

The BTRT Project's push for agricultural diversification has minimized the risk of crop failure and enabled farmers to earn income throughout the year. Nowadays, an average farmer grows about six kinds of fruits, five types of fodder and local grasses, as well as cultivates cereal crops.

The project has handed over the responsibility for managing natural forests near villages to the local users. This is resulting into denser forests. Women's CDCCs are especially keen on managing forests. The use of traditional farm management technology is common and farmers manage their land very well. Terrace slopes are within the prescribed limits and in general in good condition.

The Project identified the need for quality agricultural inputs and support services needed for utilizing marginal lands. Many groups of farmers are involved in the marginal land improvement agro-forestry program initiated with the help of the project. Farmers are not only ready to pay for fruit saplings, but they also convince their neighbours to participate in the program so that there will be a larger group fund.

Local women are very active in forest management and conservation farming activities and are fully involved in the decision making process. The major factors facilitating women's participation in CDCC proceedings were: a clear prospect of benefit sharing, support from their families and the small size of the group area served.

Many conservation farmers have adopted improved agricultural practices and share these experiences with their neighbours. They have setup demonstrations on their farms and have converted many followers, who are monitored by the conservation farmers themselves. In this way improved farming practices were spread throughout the area. Homestead agro-forestry plots were established and kitchen gardens introduced to great economic benefit. The sale of coffee, pineapples, oranges, cardamom, broom grass, and other varieties of fruits and vegetables is generating cash income for the farmers.

A Community Development Board, which operates at the village level, was formed to foster communication between the CDCCs and the VDCs. All ward members of a VDC and the chairmen of the CDCCs in a VDC are the members of the board. Technical staff in the VDC serve as advisors and facilitators of farmers' groups/organization.

In sum, an overall impression about the factors that contributed to the success of people's participation (PP) in the BTRT watershed management are outlined as follows:

- Clear and transparent decision making procedures by project management.

- Clear and simple guidelines, and flexible operational procedures to facilitate PP in watershed management.

- Well defined programs, budgets, plans, implementation procedures and benefit sharing mechanisms.

- Integration of a wide range of diversified watershed management activities and guarantee of benefits.

- Strong motivation among project staff.