Overcome the first cost barrier
8.2 The preceding Chapters have identified financing
arrangements, pricing and cost-recovery strategies, areas for use of grants and
subsidies, and the need to rationalize or eliminate discriminatory import taxes
and duties.
8.3 Financing. Given the first initial cost of
solar home systems, some form of term financing is essential and can be accessed
through ESCOs, hire-purchase and leasing arrangements or financing through
dealers or the banking system. Consumer loans which feature high down payments
(to minimize defaults) and short maturities (three or four years) limit solar
home system purchases to high-income groups. ESCOs that can obtain relatively
low-interest, long-term loans and reduce equipment costs by purchasing in bulk
may greatly increase the affordability of solar home systems. Any long-term
leasing or ESCO financing arrangement should incorporate provisions for battery
replacement, since batteries are a significant cost over the lifetime of the
system. To increase rural customers' access to financing, solar home system
program design should include streamlined loan application procedures and
flexible arrangements for securing and repaying loans. Loan officers must be
familiar with the PV system in order to facilitate and accelerate loan
processing. Finally, banking facilities or outreach efforts will stand a better
chance of success if they are conveniently located to users who need to make
regular loan payments.
8.4 Pricing Strategies and Cost-Recovery Mechanisms.
Solar home system pricing and repayment arrangements should reflect
consumers' willingness and ability to pay. In government-sponsored programs,
payments have often been set too low (at the same level as expenditures for
kerosene), even though consumers (recognizing the improved quality of PV systems
services) are often willing to pay more. Prices and fee structures should be low
enough to attract customers but high enough to cover capital, financing,
servicing, equipment replacement, and administrative costs, as well as possible
defaults. The size of the down payment appears to affect the ability and
willingness to pay for a solar home system more than the number or the size of
the monthly payments. Rural households with irregular income streams may require
seasonal rather than monthly payment schedules. Fee collection and enforcement
are best handled by appropriate local and/or national organizations.
8.5 Grants and Subsidies. Judicious use of grants
and subsidies may help catalyze a PV program but should be limited to
market-conditioning activities or (under the appropriate conditions) limited
injections of equity to buy down capital costs. Since there is no guarantee that
subsidies and grant money will continue indefinitely, these funds should not be
used to finance operating costs.
8.6 Rationalize or Eliminate Tax and Duty
Structures. High import duties, particularly on PV modules, artificially
inflate PV pricing and hinder development of large-scale, commercially viable,
market-driven solar home system programs. A reduced market raises the cost of
maintenance and other support services. This in turn decreases user
satisfaction. The resulting market distortions may also induce local suppliers
to use poor quality components that make systems less
reliable.