Volunteer Participation in Working with the Urban Poor (UNDP - UNV, 64 p.): II. Insights derived from community-based programmes: Urban informal sector: The ILO experience

Volunteer Participation in Working with the Urban Poor (UNDP - UNV, 64 p.)

(introduction...)

Introduction

Note on terminology and abbreviations

Summary

I. Urbanisation: recognition and response

(introduction...)

Urbanisation and poverty

Response to urbanisation

Recognition of ''Self-help'' initiatives

II. Insights derived from community-based programmes

(introduction...)

Urban informal sector

(introduction...)

Micro-enterprise promotion

Working conditions in the informal sector

The ILO experience

Low-income housing

Infrastructure and basic services

Health and HIV/AIDS prevention

Non-formal education and functional literacy

Women, gender and development

Children of the street

Implications for VSAs

III. Towards a community-based strategy for VSAs

Participation: how and for whose benefit?

A sense of ''community''

General characteristics of low-income urban communities

Factors determining support possibilities

General characteristics of CBOs

Support channels and intermediaries

IV. Programming concerns for VSAs and UNV

Guidelines for involvement

Success criteria for volunteer involvement

Taking the initiative

Flexibility

Meeting personnel and associated needs

Channels of operation

United Nations Agencies and their partners

Funding and other programme concerns

V. Principles and characteristics of volunteer use

Functions and volunteers

Qualities of VDWs

Teams

Skill requirements and experiences

Selection and placement process

Acculturation and language training process

Epilogue: follow-up, 1995

Annotated reference list

Annex: Excerpts from background papers

Urban development policy issues and the role of united nations volunteers

Working with the urban poor: lessons from the experience of metropolitan Lagos, Nigeria

Brief account of my experience as a DDS field worker and a UNV in Sri Lanka and Jamaica

Special consultation on volunteer participation in working with the urban poor

The ILO experience

Increasingly, UN-system projects are focusing on micro-enterprises which lend themselves to a combination of entrepreneurial training and a package of business advisory and credit services. These types of micro-enterprises, rather than those involved in trading and service activities, are seen as clearly amenable to growth and thus capable of transforming themselves into formal sector profit-oriented enterprises through productivity augmentation, technological transfer/adaptation, capital accumulation and skill development.

Within the framework provided by the World Employment Programme, the ILO since 1982 has actively sought to encourage the self-help initiatives of artisans and other workers in the informal sector to improve their income levels and living standards. ILO has also directed greater attention to encouraging the development of micro-enterprises undertaken by women and unemployed youth, even those with no formal education.

One such programme, notable for its participatory approach, is the "Programme to Support Urban Informal Sector Enterprises in French-speaking Africa" in Mali, Togo and Rwanda. This programme took two years (1982-83) to develop a suitable approach to issues of collective concern to individual artisans, which was to become the mainspring of further organised action. Three more years (1984-86) were devoted to strengthening nascent organisations encouraging self-management and providing technical assistance relevant to production needs. The final phase of the project involved the consolidation of CBOs so that they could develop a credible partnership with local authorities and institutions. At the same time, the central associations of these CBOs in capital cities were strengthened in financial and operational autonomy.

A major lesson from this and similar experiences shows that bottom-up participatory work requires time to take root so that it will become sustainable: flexibility is of utmost importance. This type of approach cannot be rushed to suit bureaucratic requirements such as project deadlines or tightly-defined expenditure schedules. Many institutions which initially embark on community-based organisational work find their that their endeavours fail, largely due to institutional impatience.