Coordinated scheme mounted to curtail grain borer losses
Nearly four years after the alarm was first sounded by a group
of farmers in the Tanzanian village of Itunda, a solution to the problem of how
to deal with the invasion of the larger grain borer- a predator of the family
Bostrychidae whose main tar gets are maize and cassava stocks an her-vests (see
Ceres, Nov. Dec. 1982) is still far off. But while the dumunzi, as the
Tanzanians call it, cannot yet be eradicated, measures are being taken to curb
the havoc it causes an to stop it from spreading to other regions of the country
and across the borders.
It is the vastness of the problem that poses the greatest
challenge: the latest research findings indicate that this insect, which was
unknown in Africa until a few years ago, has now become firmly established in
the northern half of Tanzania. By August 1984, it had been reported in the
border zones of Burundi and the extreme south of Kenya, and in earl 1985, it was
found in West Africa, in the LomTogo) region. Although i is a winged insect,
the data collected on it so far suggests that it is mainly propagated by being
transported in maize and dried cassava, and probably in contaminated sacks.
No one is certain where the dumuzi originally came from, even
though it is known in Central America, Mexico and the southern United States.
But from the findings of the first surveys conducted in Tanzania by a team from
the British Tropical Development Research Institute, we now know that it can
cause grain losses of over 10 per cent, which means 10 per cent less grain
available for consumption and sowing. Tanzania's aggregate annual potential
maize loss in 1982 has bee put at 543 000 tons, worth several million dollars,
working in conjunction with the programme officials, has shown that the most
effective weapon against the dumuzi so far discovered is 0.5 per cent permethrin
powder, of which 50 grams is enough to protect 90 kilos of matzo for about 10
months. But it is only effective if the farmers are prepared to break with
tradition and husk them maize before storing it. This method not only requires
them to adopt new storage techniques, but it also takes time, having to husk
manually the 500 kilos that the average household farm produces imposes a heavy
burden on all the members of the family, at precisely the time when they have to
harvest tobacco and cotton, whose cropping cycle follows on the heels of maize.
To overcome this problem, the far-mere have to use manual huskers so that the
operation can be completed in a matter of days Research is being conducted to
produce a husking machine that will meet their needs, and which can be
manufactured locally.
After the 1984 harvest in the Tabora region, in the north of the
country, it was found that dumuzi infestation was about half that in previous
years. The experts felt that this decline was due to the fact that the 1983
stocks, which might have been a potential source of infestation, had been almost
entirely disposed of. Many farmers have therefore decided to wait and see
whether the insect reappears before husking their maize and buying permethrin.
Yet in some of the villages, about half the small farmers who still vividly
recall the disastrous situation they experienced in previous years have agreed
to test out the new methods being proposed.
One of the main reasons for the success of this first campaign,
apart from the fact that it has made inputs (sacks, insecticides) readily
available, is the hard work put in by the extension workers, rural development
officials, and agricultural produce inspectors at local and regional level. Just
before the campaign started, about 900 of them went on crash courses lasting
several days, run by regional supervisors and district storage officials, who
had previously been given appropriate training. This programme is scheduled to
be repeated over the next few months, and teaching aids (folders, posters,
films, and videos on husking and storage techniques) are now being produced, and
will be made available to the extension workers.
However, despite these encouraging results, there arc still a
great many hurdles to overcome if the dumuzi is to be beaten. The sheer size of
the region creates serious logistical problems (roads and vehicles),
particularly the transport of materials and extension workers and stock
supervision officials both on the farms and at the market. There is no immediate
problem with supplying 0.5 per cent permethrin. In 1984, the Tanzanian
Government bought 160 tons of insecticide that was re-packed in 30- and 50-gram
packets The new maize storage techniques involve the use of sacks or woven
baskets which can be produced locally, but if the new techniques are to catch on
quickly, over a million more sacks will have to be made immediately available. A
further problem is the fact that the dumuzi also attacks cassava when it has
been dried and stored on the farm, and the researchers have not yet come up with
a fully satisfactory method of protecting it.
While work is moving ahead in Tanzania, the bordering countries
have to set about tackling the problem, now that they are aware of it. Just
after the larger grain borer had been discovered in the border areas, a
cooperation project was prepared in Burundi to initiate a campaign to control
and combat this parasite. In Kenya and Togo, similar programmes have been set up
with technical assistance supplied by the Government of the Federal Republic of
Germany under its bilateral aid
programmes.