Cover Image
close this book Daughters of Sysiphus
close this folder Premises of the study
View the document Premise one
View the document Premise two
View the document Premise three
View the document The need for this study
close this folder Jamaica - A background
View the document Population
View the document Natural hazards and disasters
View the document Economy
View the document Politics
View the document Urban kingston
View the document Historical aspects of the household in Jamaica
View the document Shelter policies
View the document The construction labour force
close this folder Overview of findings and recommendations
View the document Household distribution
View the document Occupations and education
View the document Expenditure
View the document Savings and loans
View the document Density
View the document Tenure and mobility
View the document Physical and social infrastructure
View the document The building process
close this folder Methodology
View the document Low-income household survey
View the document Case studies
View the document Methodological issues
close this folder Education and occupations
View the document Education
View the document Occupations
View the document The stories behind the figures
View the document Recommendations
close this folder Expenditure
View the document Expenditure on shelter
View the document Expenditure on food
View the document The stories behind the figures
View the document How to spend a windfall
View the document The stories behind the windfall figures
View the document Differences between men and women in money management
View the document Spending on entertainment
View the document Recommendations
close this folder Savings and loans
View the document Savings
View the document Attitudes towards the partner
View the document Choices of form of saving
View the document Recommendations
close this folder Density
View the document Household size
View the document Number of people per room
View the document The yard
View the document The experience behind the figures
View the document Recommendation
close this folder Mobility and tenure
View the document Mobility
View the document The stories behind the figures
View the document The experience behind the figures
View the document Recommendations
close this folder Infrastructure - physical and social
View the document Water
View the document Electricity
View the document Fuel
View the document Garbage
View the document Social infrastructure
View the document Recommendations
close this folder The building process
View the document Building a house
View the document Investing in improvements
View the document The stories behind the figures
View the document Vulnerability to natural hazards
View the document Recommendations
close this folder Conclusions, guidelines and further research
View the document Some guidelines for public-sector housing and shelter agencies
View the document Suggestions for further research
View the document Bibliography
close this folder Annexes
View the document Annex I - Glossary of terms
View the document Annex II - Overview of the women who served as case studies
View the document Annex III - Lena

Building a house

Female heads of household proved less likely to have had the experience of managing the construction of their own house or its improvements. 13 per cent of female heads of household had built their own house compared with 18 per cent of male and 18 per cent of joint heads of household.

These figures are largely a reflection of the fact that fewer female heads of household have the land tenure that allows for investment in the construction process. When you rent you tend not to spend any money on either expanding or improving the unit you are in. However, women who are only renting the land that their house is on, or who own their own land or who are squatting, have almost invariably participated actively in the process of building a dwelling and installing the support infrastructure that a dwelling requires.

Different types of household vary in the kind of labour that they use when they are building. When women manage the construction process they are less likely to use their own physical labour than men. Whereas 42 per cent of joint heads of household and 56 per cent of male heads used their own labour in the construction of the house, this was true of only 21 per cent of the female heads.

However, women are more likely than other heads of household to mobilize construction assistance from their relatives. 47 per cent of female heads used family labour as compared with 24 per cent of male and 20 per cent of joint heads.

Female heads also proved more likely to employ artisans to do the work (with all the commensurate expense). While only 11 per cent of joint heads employed an artisan, 26 per cent of female heads did so.

Male and joint heads were much more likely to call on a network of friends to assist them with 50 per cent of male heads and 38 per cent of joint heads reporting use of friends' labour. Only 15 per cent of female heads used friends to help them do the work.

To a large degree, women who build their own houses or make their own improvements assume the role of financiers and managers of the building process. However, women have also often played a part in the physical work involved in construction as some of the stories that emerged from the case studies will demonstrate. It is unfortunate that this participation by women in the actual construction work has received so little attention in national vocational training systems which, all too often, assume that women are not capable of, or interested in, earning a living within the construction trades.