Cover Image
close this bookDisaster Reports : The Effects of Hurricane David. 1979, on the Population of Dominica (PAHO)
close this folder3. Results
close this folder3.4. Injuries
View the document3.4.1. Characteristics of the injured population
View the document3.4.2. The occurrence, causes and nature of the injuries
View the document3.4.3. Medical help for the injured

3.4.2. The occurrence, causes and nature of the injuries

When did the injuries occur ?

Table 23: Time of Injury

Time

No. of cases

% of total

Disaster day a.m.

101

39.5





55.6 %

Disaster day p.m.

52

20.3


2-7 days later

68

26.6





40.2 %

8 days - 1 month later

35

13.7


Total

256

100.0


On the 29th August, the hurricane swept Dominica from mid-morning until late afternoon, and while 40 % were injured in the first few hours, 20 % were injured later in the day (Table 23). A surprisingly large proportion of injuries, 40 %, occurred after the cyclone had passed, in the days and even in the following weeks.

Where did the injuries occur ?

Three-quarters of all injuries happened to people who were outside in the open air. One quarter occurred inside. Of these, 4/5 were in the home and 1/5 in other, public buildings.

What were people doing when they were injured?

Table 24: Activity and Injury

Activity

No. of cases

% of total

Running to safety or escaping from falling house

95

43.4

Clearing debris, putting roof back on

47

21.5

Looking at damage

23

10.5

Helping others (to safety etc...)

13

5.9

Closing windows and doors

8

3.7

Other (playing, cultivating, travelling, sleeping etc...)

33

15.0

Total

219

100.0

As shown in Table 24, most of the injuries occurred when people were trying to seek protection from the force of the hurricane. Next in frequency came injuries that occurred during the process of clearing up and reconstructing homes. The third most common group of injuries were to those who were carrying out no m al activities unconnected with the disaster as such.

Included in the category of those who were injured while running to safety was one person who was hurt while trying to obtain medical aid and three people injured while wading through flood water. Because of the steeply sloping nature of the land, there was comparatively little flooding associated with hurricane David. Nevertheless, storm waves destroyed roads and coastal facilities as well as, in some areas, houses close to the shore.

Table 25 shows what people were doing at different times. On disaster day, over 70 % of all the injuries for which we have details occurred when running for shelter. Later, over 40 % of the injuries happened during the process of clearing up and a further 20 % when examining the damage.

Table 25: Injury According to Time and Activity

Activity

Disaster day

Later


No. of cases

% of each activity

No. of cases

% of each activity


a.m.

p.m.


days 2-7

days 8-1 mth


Running to safety or escaping from falling house

65

25

95

3

2

5

Clearing debris, putting roof back on

4

5

19

32

6

81

Looking at damage

2

1

13

16

4

87

Helping other (to safety etc...)

5

4

69

2

2

31

Cloning windows and doors

5

3

100

-

-

-

Other (playing. cultivating etc...)

4

5

27

8

16

73

Total

85

43


61

30


(X2 p < 0.001 for the difference between disaster day and later)

Table 26: Injury According to Time and Place

PLACE

Time

Outside

Inside House


No. of cases

% of total

No. of cases

% of total

Disaster day a.m.

68

36.4

28

54.9

Disaster day p.m.

40

21.4

8

15.7

2-7 days later

52

27.8

11

21.6

8 days - 1 month later

27

14.4

4

7.8

Total

187

100.0

51

100.0

X2 p < 0.05

Table 26 shows the difference in the proportion of injuries occurring outside and inside houses, according to the time at which the injury took place. 70 % of injuries inside the home occurred on the day of the disaster, while only 58 % of those outside happened then. The high proportion of injuries sustained outside and which occurred after the hurricane had passed may be partly explained by the number of injuries caused by wreckage lying on the ground and by the fact that moat house repairs, notably re-roofing (when a fair number of injuries occurred), were carried out externally.

Table 26 excludes the 12 injuries that occurred in buildings other than houses. If these are included, the difference between injuries occurring inside and outside according to time ceases to be significant.

Table 27: Injury According to Activity and Place

Activity

Outside*

Inside house**


No. of cases

% of total

No. of cases

% of total

Running to safety or escaping from falling house

82

46

7

27

Clearing debris, putting roof back on

41

23

2

8

Looking at damage

21

12

2

8

Helping others (to safety etc...)

11

6

1

4

Closing windows and doors

2

1

4

15

Other (playing, cultivating, sleeping, travelling etc...)

22

12

10

38

Total

179

100

26

100

Note : This table based on partial information excludes the 12 injuries occurring in buildings other than houses.

* Information not available for 8 cases (5 %)
** Information not available for 25 cases (49 %)

The effects of age

Table 28: Time of Injury and Major Age Groups

Time

Age group


0-19

20-29

40-59

60 +

Total

Disaster day






a.m.

31

34

23

13

101

p.m.

15

17

12

8

52

Total

46

51

35

21

153


58.2 %

60.0 %

57.4 %

67.7 %

59.8 %

Later






days 2-7

21

19

19

9

68

days 8-1 month

12

15

7

1

35

Total

33

34

26

10

103


41.8 %

40.0 %

42.6 %

32.2 %

40.2 %

Grand total

79

85

61

31

256


100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0 %

100.0%

There was no significant difference in time, day of the disaster or later, according to age (Table 28). Compared with the rest of the population, however, those over 60 suffered a slightly higher proportion of their injuries on the disaster day itself.

Table 29: Place of Injury and Major Age Groups

Age groups

Outside

Inside House


No. of cases

% of total

No. of cases

% of total

0-19

59

31.6

15

29.4

20-39

67

35.8

16

31.4

40-59

40

21.4

10

19.6

over 60

21

11.2

10

19.6

Total

187

100.0

51

100.0

There was no significant difference in the age distribution between, those injured outside or inside, whether one considers houses alone or all buildings (of those injured in other buildings four were aged 0-19, one 20-39 and seven 40-59). However, those over 60 were rather less likely than the rest of the population to have been injured outside and somewhat more likely to have been hurt in their homes (Table 29).

The different age groups showed differences in activity at the time that injuries occurred (Table 30). Over half of those in the youngest and oldest age groups, for whom we have details, were injured while running away. Some youngsters said they got injured while looking at the damage.

Table 30: Activity and Injury According to Major Age Groups

Activity

Age group


0-19

%

20-39

%

40-59

%

60 +

%

Total

%

Running to safety etc...

35

51

25

34

21

40

14

56

95

43

Clearing debris

9

13

17

23

16

30

5

20

47

21

Looking at damage

10

17

8

11

3

6

2

8

23

11

Helping others

1

2

7

10

5

10

-

-

13

6

Closing windows etc...

-

-

4

6

4

7

-

-

8

4

Other (playing etc...)

13

19

12

16

4

7

4

16

33

15

Total

68

100

73

100

53

100

25

100

219

100

(X2 p < 0.05)

The nature of the injury

Table 31: The Immediate Cause of the Injury

Cause

No. of cases

% of total

Nails

63

33.0

Galvanized roofing sheets

50

26.2

Glass

34

17.8

Falling Over

15

7.8

Pieces of wood

13

6.8

Tree

11

5.8

House collapsing

5

2.6

Total

219

100.0

A very high proportion of the injuries, over 80 %, were caused by building materials, which were scattered about when the hurricane-force winds blew houses apart (Table 31).

There was 8 significant difference in the cause of injuries according to age groups (X2, p < 0.005). For example, youngsters were more offer injured by nails, while those over 60 were hurt by falling over (or being blown over).

Table 32: The Part of the Body Injured

Part of body

No. of cases

% of total

Feet

116

45.0

Legs

51

19.8

Hands

34

13.2

Heat

20

7.7

Arms

13

5.0

Back

10

3.9

Chest

6

2.3

Abdomen

6

2.3

Shoulders

2

0.6

Total

258*

100.0

(*Two people were injured in more than one part of the body).

Almost two-thirds of injuries affected the lower limbs. Injuries to the upper limbs, particularly the hands, were next in frequency.

Table 33: Type of Injury

Injury

No. of cases

% of total

Cut

109

42.2

Nail wound

82

31.8

Blow

39

15.1

Other

24

9.3

Unknown

4

1.6

Total

258

100.0

Most injuries were caused by cuts from galvanized roofing sheets and by nails fixed on them and on any loose building material.

The description of the nature of the injuries suffered (as given in the preceeding paragraphs) suggests that a certain proportion are likely to have been relatively minor. This should be born in mind when reading the subsequent section on medical aid.